[dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- From: Michael Fuchs <michael.fuchs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: dbdoclet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jere.Kapyaho@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:08:25 +0200
Hello Jere,
your bug is already fixed, but I am still working on the jdk 1.5
support. Additionally two weeks ago I became the father of twins, which
delays the delivery of 0.65.0 :-)). I hope it will be finished in the
end of october.
Regards
Michael
Jere.Kapyaho@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>Hi Michael,
>
>any news on the fix for 0.65.0?
>
>Actually there is a workaround, but it is very messy and must be
>duplicated for each package:
>
>1) Write the package description in DocBook XML.
>2) Define a file entity in the main DocBook XML document, referring to
>the file created in 1).
>3) Create a dummy package.html with only a reference to the entity
>inside a body tag.
>
>This pulls the DocBook XML content into the XML file created by
>dbdoclet.
>
>--Jere
>
- References:
- [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- From: Jere.Kapyaho
Other related posts:
- » [dbdoclet] Part/reference relationship
- » [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- » [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- » [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- » [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- » [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- » [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- » [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- From: Jere.Kapyaho