[dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- From: <Jere.Kapyaho@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <dbdoclet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 17:44:47 +0300
Hi Michael,
any news on the fix for 0.65.0?
Actually there is a workaround, but it is very messy and must be
duplicated for each package:
1) Write the package description in DocBook XML.
2) Define a file entity in the main DocBook XML document, referring to
the file created in 1).
3) Create a dummy package.html with only a reference to the entity
inside a body tag.
This pulls the DocBook XML content into the XML file created by
dbdoclet.
--Jere
>-----Original Message-----
>From: dbdoclet-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:dbdoclet-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ext Michael Fuchs
>Sent: 16 August, 2005 11:28
>To: dbdoclet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
>
>Hello Jere,
>
>I am working on it. It will be fixed in the next release
>(0.65.0). I hope I can deliver it next week.
>>The error was actually caused by the same package.html
>handling issue I
>>reported earlier, i.e. dbdoclet pulled in the contents of a
>>package.html file verbatim, not converting the HTML to DocBook XML.
>>This caused a validation error. Somehow I came to the conclusion I
>>posted, but that was false. Sorry again.
>>
>>Any ideas on a workaround for the moment?
>Sorry, no.
>
>Regards
>Michael
>
>
- Follow-Ups:
- [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- From: Michael Fuchs
Other related posts:
- » [dbdoclet] Part/reference relationship
- » [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- » [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- » [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- » [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- » [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- » [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- » [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- From: Michael Fuchs