[dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- From: Michael Fuchs <michael.fuchs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: dbdoclet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 10:28:08 +0200
Hello Jere,
I am working on it. It will be fixed in the next release (0.65.0). I
hope I can deliver it next week.
>The error was actually caused by the same package.html handling issue I
>reported earlier, i.e. dbdoclet pulled in the contents of a package.html
>file verbatim, not converting the HTML to DocBook XML. This caused a
>validation error. Somehow I came to the conclusion I posted, but that
>was false. Sorry again.
>
>Any ideas on a workaround for the moment?
Sorry, no.
Regards
Michael
- References:
- [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- From: Jere.Kapyaho
Other related posts:
- » [dbdoclet] Part/reference relationship
- » [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- » [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- » [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- » [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- » [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- » [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- » [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
- From: Jere.Kapyaho