[dbdoclet] Constant field values revisited - appendix vs chapter?

Hi,

some time ago Michael implemented the list of constant field values. =
Currently it is an appendix element, as that was what seemed sensible =
then. However, that caused a problem in a project where we have a =
structure like this:

Book
    Part I. Overview
    Part II. Reference  <-- the only part created by dbdoclet
       Chapter: Package X
       Chapter: Package Y
       Appendix: Constant field values
    An Appendix=20
    Another appendix
    Index

Now what happens is that if you have one or more appendices at the book =
level, the labeling starts at 'B' since the constant values appendix =
already takes up the first 'A' label...=20

I am thinking maybe the constant field values section would be better as =
a chapter instead of an appendix. What do you think? Could/should this =
be made configurable?

--Jere

--=20
Jere K=E4pyaho (jere U+002E kapyaho U+0040 nokia U+002E com)
Senior Design Engineer, Java Platform Standardization
Technology Platforms
Nokia Corporation

Other related posts: