[softwarelist] Re: icnclipbrd 0.12
- From: David Pilling <flist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: davidpilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:07:53 +0000
In message <2fd661424f.steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Steve Fryatt
<lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
The fault could easily lie on either side: the RAM XFer code in IcnClipBrd
had been commented out since I took over the module, and -- although I've
gone through it all carefully and tested it as much as possible -- there's
a possibility that it was disabled for a reason.
Just to keep everyone up to date. Entirely due to Steve Fryatt's efforts
the problem with icnclipbrd is now solved.
I'll produce a new version of OP for RISC OS soon which fixes the
problem.
The ram transfer code in OP has been making assumptions about the
behaviour of other programs which are not justified by the Acorn
specification of the protocol.
--
David Pilling
email: david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
web: http://www.davidpilling.net
post: David Pilling P.O. Box 22 Thornton Cleveleys Blackpool. FY5 1LR UK
fax: +44(0)870-0520-941
- Follow-Ups:
- [softwarelist] Re: icnclipbrd 0.12
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: icnclipbrd 0.12
- From: Dr Peter Young
- References:
- [softwarelist] Re: icnclipbrd 0.12
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: icnclipbrd 0.12
- From: Paul Sprangers
- [softwarelist] Re: icnclipbrd 0.12
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: icnclipbrd 0.12
- From: Steve Fryatt
Other related posts:
- » [softwarelist] icnclipbrd 0.12
- » [softwarelist] Re: icnclipbrd 0.12
- » [softwarelist] Re: icnclipbrd 0.12
- » [softwarelist] Re: icnclipbrd 0.12
- » [softwarelist] Re: icnclipbrd 0.12
- » [softwarelist] Re: icnclipbrd 0.12
- » [softwarelist] Re: icnclipbrd 0.12
- » [softwarelist] Re: icnclipbrd 0.12
- » [softwarelist] Re: icnclipbrd 0.12
The fault could easily lie on either side: the RAM XFer code in IcnClipBrd had been commented out since I took over the module, and -- although I've gone through it all carefully and tested it as much as possible -- there's a possibility that it was disabled for a reason.
- [softwarelist] Re: icnclipbrd 0.12
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: icnclipbrd 0.12
- From: Dr Peter Young
- [softwarelist] Re: icnclipbrd 0.12
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: icnclipbrd 0.12
- From: Paul Sprangers
- [softwarelist] Re: icnclipbrd 0.12
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: icnclipbrd 0.12
- From: Steve Fryatt