[softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- From: Clive Bonsall <C.Bonsall@xxxxxxxx>
- To: davidpilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 18:10:52 +0000
David Pilling wrote:
In message <EE8377BF-AF3A-4A79-B2FC-49CB176343DA@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michael
Talibard <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
Most of the filters in ovationpro/resource are 32-bit compatible,
but not !TransRTF. Any chance of this soon? Or ever?
Two things, TransRTF is a separate piece of code to OP, therefore I'd
assume it can run under Aemulor.
Second. I did an RTF loader for Windows. I can easily compile it for
RISC OS, but no one has ever given any feedback on how they rate the
Windows RTF filter (e.g. compared to the RISC OS one).
A while ago I gave you some feedback on the Windows version (tho' not a
comparison with the RISC OS one). It does a good job, so I'd say go
ahead and compile it for RISC OS.
--
CB
- Follow-Ups:
- [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- From: David Pilling
- References:
- [softwarelist] TransRTF
- From: Michael Talibard
- [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- From: David Pilling
Other related posts:
- » [softwarelist] TransRTF
- » [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- » [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- » [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- » [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- » [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- » [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- » [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- » [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- » [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- » [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- » [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
Most of the filters in ovationpro/resource are 32-bit compatible, but not !TransRTF. Any chance of this soon? Or ever?
Two things, TransRTF is a separate piece of code to OP, therefore I'd assume it can run under Aemulor.
Second. I did an RTF loader for Windows. I can easily compile it for RISC OS, but no one has ever given any feedback on how they rate the Windows RTF filter (e.g. compared to the RISC OS one).
- [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] TransRTF
- From: Michael Talibard
- [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- From: David Pilling