[softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- From: charles <charles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: davidpilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 14:59:12 +0000 (GMT)
In article <319092814e.pnyoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Dr Peter Young <pnyoung@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 6 Nov 2006 charles <charles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > In article <105c91814e.pnyoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > Dr Peter Young <pnyoung@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On 6 Nov 2006 Michael Talibard <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> >
> >> > Most of the filters in ovationpro/resource are 32-bit compatible,
> >> > but not !TransRTF. Any chance of this soon? Or ever?
> >
> >> FWIW it works fine with Aemulor Pro.
> >
> > but doesn't that mean the whole of OvPro has to use Ae Pro?
> Not according to what it tells me here; TransRTF just makes a very
> fleeting appearance in A Pro's tasks display while it does its stuff.
That is something I didn't realise that Ae Pro was able to do. Ae (basic)
couldn't
--
From KT24 - in "Leafy Surrey"
Using a RISC OS computer running v5.11
- References:
- [softwarelist] TransRTF
- From: Michael Talibard
- [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- From: Dr Peter Young
- [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- From: charles
- [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- From: Dr Peter Young
Other related posts:
- » [softwarelist] TransRTF
- » [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- » [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- » [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- » [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- » [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- » [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- » [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- » [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- » [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- » [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- » [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- [softwarelist] TransRTF
- From: Michael Talibard
- [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- From: Dr Peter Young
- [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- From: charles
- [softwarelist] Re: TransRTF
- From: Dr Peter Young