[softwarelist] Re: SparkFS and .rar
- From: Stefan Bellon <sbellon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: davidpilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:38:44 +0100
Robert Greenfield wrote:
> On 19 Feb, Stefan Bellon <sbellon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > A more technically interesting point is, that this UnRAR module
> > must have to be built with GCC and not with Norcroft, as the UnRAR
> > code for version 3 rarchives is written in C++.
> Oh! Can Norcroft still not really do C++ very well?
There hasn't been any C++ development on top of that Cfront thing.
> > I think there are quite a few
> > obstacles in the way.
> Could SparkFS be used as a front end for the existing unRAR module?
Which "existing unRAR module" are you referring to?
--
Stefan Bellon
- Follow-Ups:
- [softwarelist] Re: SparkFS and .rar
- From: Robert Greenfield
- References:
- [softwarelist] SparkFS and .rar
- From: Robert Greenfield
- [softwarelist] Re: SparkFS and .rar
- From: Stefan Bellon
- [softwarelist] Re: SparkFS and .rar
- From: Robert Greenfield
Other related posts:
- » [softwarelist] SparkFS and .rar
- » [softwarelist] Re: SparkFS and .rar
- » [softwarelist] Re: SparkFS and .rar
- » [softwarelist] Re: SparkFS and .rar
- » [softwarelist] Re: SparkFS and .rar
- » [softwarelist] Re: SparkFS and .rar
- » [softwarelist] Re: SparkFS and .rar
- [softwarelist] Re: SparkFS and .rar
- From: Robert Greenfield
- [softwarelist] SparkFS and .rar
- From: Robert Greenfield
- [softwarelist] Re: SparkFS and .rar
- From: Stefan Bellon
- [softwarelist] Re: SparkFS and .rar
- From: Robert Greenfield