[softwarelist] Re: PostScript and PDF
- From: David Pilling <flist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: davidpilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 22:03:48 +0000
In message <op.ulnqr9x97kyep4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Clive Bonsall
<cbonsall@xxxxxxx> writes
output). If I edit the PS file in Notepad and change all references to
OP_Times_New_Roman to Times-Roman (the closest [Adobe] system font),
then I can edit the resulting PDF, but of course the Adobe font is
noticeably different from the OP font. The PDFs generated from the
DirectPS are on average bigger than those generated via Windows. Does
this suggest that fonts are not being embedded? On the other hand, if
font embedding fails,
My guess would be that text in embedded fonts can't be edited. There is
for example the point that in an embedded font one need only embed
characters actually used in the document. The fact that direct PS files
are bigger might indicate that they embed fonts whilst the Windows
driver does not.
As I hinted there usually is in Windows drivers a section where you can
choose what to do with fonts, either map them to standard PS fonts which
are assumed to be in the PS device or download them. This section can be
difficult to locate.
Presumably the problem is that you're using the same driver and only
changing the direct PS setting - so there can be no change in font
mapping settings?
--
David Pilling
email: david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
web: http://www.davidpilling.net
post: David Pilling P.O. Box 22 Thornton Cleveleys Blackpool. FY5 1LR UK
fax: +44(0)870-0520-941
To unsubscribe or subscribe goto: http://www.freelists.org/list/davidpilling
Other related posts: