[softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- From: "M.Bellamy" <M.Bellamy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: davidpilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 13:36:30 +0100
At 13:29 13/07/2006 +0100, you wrote:
On 13 Jul 2006 Chris Johnson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
> OK. Just to make sure I have rebooted - iconbar certainly looks a lot
> less congested now. I have checked Boot->config->Misc to make sure
> lazy task switching is not disabled. Repeated your test and there is
> definitely no flickering.
>
> I have typed gibberish as fast as I can hit the keys, and also held
> keys down to autorepeat many times. Task display slot is rock steady.
I just wondered, from my usual point of view of ignorance, whether the
presence or absence of Aemulor (+-Pro) might be relevant. We know that
Paul won't have anything to do with Aemulor; could this possibly be
why different people report different experiences?
Could it be different settings for spell-checking or the undo buffer?
MattLB
- Follow-Ups:
- [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- From: Paul Vigay
- References:
- [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- From: Chris Johnson
- [softwarelist] OvationPro and memory allocation
- From: Paul Vigay
- [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- From: Chris Johnson
- [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- From: Paul Vigay
- [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- From: Tim Powys-Lybbe
- [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- From: Paul Vigay
- [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- From: Dr Peter Young
Other related posts:
- » [softwarelist] OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- » [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
On 13 Jul 2006 Chris Johnson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
> OK. Just to make sure I have rebooted - iconbar certainly looks a lot > less congested now. I have checked Boot->config->Misc to make sure > lazy task switching is not disabled. Repeated your test and there is > definitely no flickering. > > I have typed gibberish as fast as I can hit the keys, and also held > keys down to autorepeat many times. Task display slot is rock steady.
I just wondered, from my usual point of view of ignorance, whether the presence or absence of Aemulor (+-Pro) might be relevant. We know that Paul won't have anything to do with Aemulor; could this possibly be why different people report different experiences?
Could it be different settings for spell-checking or the undo buffer?
- [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- From: Paul Vigay
- [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- From: Chris Johnson
- [softwarelist] OvationPro and memory allocation
- From: Paul Vigay
- [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- From: Chris Johnson
- [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- From: Paul Vigay
- [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- From: Tim Powys-Lybbe
- [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- From: Paul Vigay
- [softwarelist] Re: OvationPro and memory allocation
- From: Dr Peter Young