[softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: Chris Manning <cgm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: davidpilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 09:07:43 +0100
In message <4FBA948FE0%cgm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> I wrote:
about pages in OPro files converted to PDF being rotated from their original
orientation.
> The document with which I chose to experiment is a letter, intended for
> printing on A4 paper in portrait orientation, the first page containing
> five text frames, the second a single picture frame. The "picture"
> started life as a scanned, A5 (portrait) order form, which was then
> loaded, as a Sprite, into Draw, text was added, all the various objects
> then grouped, and the entire thing rotated through ninety degrees, so
> that Ovation sees it as a A5 landscape picture filling the top half of
> an A4 portrait page.
> the second page is displayed by !PDF as a landscape A4 page, the
> right-hand half of which is occupied by a portrait A5 picture frame.
> Printing it on the LJ printer from !PDF results in a portrait A5 frame
> half way down, but on the extreme RH edge of, my A4 portrait page.
> The results are the same whether I create the PDF file manually, or
> via PrintPDF.
And the answer (to someone else's question) was provided Martin Wuerthner
on another mailing list: pass the parameter
-dAutoRotatePages=/None
to GhostScript.
PrintPDF will do this, but its operation seems to be somewhat haphazard
(sometimes it passes about 200 bytes of parameters to GhostScript, sometimes
nearly a thousand), possibly requiring the program to be quit and reloaded
after the options are selected and saved to disc. I'm afraid I ran out of
enthusiasm for experimentation once I had persuaded it to work, but
AutoPageRotation: 0
seems to be the required magic incantation.
Chris
--
To unsubscribe or subscribe goto: http://www.freelists.org/list/davidpilling
- Follow-Ups:
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: Dr Peter Young
- References:
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: Chris Manning
Other related posts:
- » [softwarelist] O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: Dr Peter Young
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: Chris Manning