[softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: Phillip Marsden <phillip.marsden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: davidpilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:14:33 +0100
Paul Vigay wrote:
In a dim and distant universe <486409A3.30108@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Phillip Marsden <phillip.marsden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> enlightened us thusly:
[Snippety snip]
Paul, I do not troll.
Yes you were. You distorted a comment about the limitations of Word (which
most will agree on) and expanded it into a RISC OS knocking session.
not, they would still be within the RISC OS market, and David Pilling
would not have to be concerned about the future of OPro (which is the
real topic of this thread).
I thought he was concerned about lack of sales of the PC version - when
numerous people have expressed their support in paying for a RISC OS
version update.
If there is future development and an update to OvPro for RISC OS, I'd be
willing to sponsor a full page advert in RISC OS Now magazine.
Believe what you will Paul.
I know that you mean well and want to do the best for RISC OS. The
problem is that you appear to find it difficult to separate truth or
reality from conspiracy theories. I watch the discussions between
yourself and other people who I consider to be really technical (you are
a nice chap Paul, but I don't think that you are as proficient in many
things as you think you are) and I see a constant slip-sliding away from
points under discussion, ignoring the point that you just lost. This
reminds me of someone else who haunts these forums, but I would not put
you in HIS league.
The statements that you make about Java in another post are a good
example. Major corporations are putting much money into developing major
applications in Java, but the truth according to Paul Vigay is that Java
has not progressed much beyond applets. You make a point about Java
being restricted to a "walled garden", as if this is a bad point. The
promoters of Java call this security, something that RISC OS does not
have, and this has been attested by some of the most prolific developers
in the RISC OS field. There is no point in trying to win people over
with arguments like this Paul, as only those who know less than you will
be fooled by it.
--
Regards, Phillip Marsden
For quality bespoke acoustic guitars
phillip.marsden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or subscribe goto: http://www.freelists.org/list/davidpilling
- Follow-Ups:
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: Paul Vigay
- References:
- [softwarelist] O-Pro's future
- From: Torrens (lists)
- [softwarelist] O-Pro's future
- From: Robert Greenfield
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: Robert Greenfield
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: Robert Greenfield
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: Phil Dennison
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: Phillip Marsden
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: Paul Vigay
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: Phillip Marsden
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: Paul Vigay
Other related posts:
- » [softwarelist] O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- » [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
In a dim and distant universe <486409A3.30108@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Phillip Marsden <phillip.marsden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> enlightened us thusly: [Snippety snip]
Paul, I do not troll.
Yes you were. You distorted a comment about the limitations of Word (which most will agree on) and expanded it into a RISC OS knocking session.
not, they would still be within the RISC OS market, and David Pilling would not have to be concerned about the future of OPro (which is the real topic of this thread).
I thought he was concerned about lack of sales of the PC version - when numerous people have expressed their support in paying for a RISC OS version update. If there is future development and an update to OvPro for RISC OS, I'd be willing to sponsor a full page advert in RISC OS Now magazine.
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: Paul Vigay
- [softwarelist] O-Pro's future
- From: Torrens (lists)
- [softwarelist] O-Pro's future
- From: Robert Greenfield
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: Robert Greenfield
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: Robert Greenfield
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: Phil Dennison
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: Phillip Marsden
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: Paul Vigay
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: Phillip Marsden
- [softwarelist] Re: O-Pro's future
- From: Paul Vigay