[softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Martin Wuerthner <public@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: davidpilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 20:33:49 +0100
In message <WbYJA2DqnbdFFwVy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
David Pilling <flist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In message <cab190904e.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Martin Wuerthner
> <public@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
>>I can confirm that the error IS from GDraw, the Computer Concepts Draw
>
> Well done Martin.
>
> One way of looking at the problem was to say where does that error come
> from.
>
> There are things, like (heaven help me) SpecialFX that use GDraw to
> replace RISC OS Draw module, but if working correctly they don't
> when printing.
True, there have been problems like that with SpecialFX. However, I do
not run SpecialFX or FontFix and I am pretty certain that there is no
other piece of software running that calls GDraw directly. One thing I
could imagine is that OP calls something like Draw_Fill with very
large coordinates or a strange matrix. This could happen when drawing
the frame background.
Yes, the frame background is definitely involved: If you set both
frames to Transparent, the file prints without any problems. Set them
back to White and the error returns. So, I guess that after the
conversion some internal state of the frame is not set correctly that
causes a Draw SWI to be called with unusual parameters.
Martin
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Wuerthner MW Software martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Martin Wuerthner
- References:
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Martin Wuerthner
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
Other related posts:
- » [softwarelist] OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Martin Wuerthner
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Martin Wuerthner
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling