[softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre <ray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: davidpilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 23:02:17 +0000 (GMT)
In article <ci1be9AcfCdFFwGE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Pilling
<flist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
> >I have now tried that - although it's not an operational sequence
> >that I have ever used before (always learning). And it *does*
> >retain the 100% scale. Thanks, I'll remember that.
> The scale is 100% because the frame is exactly the right size
> (which we worked out was due to it being embedded). What is
> interesting is if this way of replacing the picture fixes the
> printing problem.
I didn't try printing it when initially trying the above, so I've
just tried it again and the same old printing problem occurs - yet
replacing the pic 'my way' does cure it (albeit with the unwanted
reduction to 70%).
I hope that offers you some clues ....
--
Regards from Ray Favre. Email at: <ray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Web site at: <http://www.rayfavre.me.uk/>
Tel: (+44) (0)1895 444410
- Follow-Ups:
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] OPro 2.76
- From: Chris Johnson
- References:
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
Other related posts:
- » [softwarelist] OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] OPro 2.76
- From: Chris Johnson
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling