[softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling <flist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: davidpilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 13:51:24 +0000
In message <4e8feef32eray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ray Favre
<ray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
I've not been thinking about this problem the way that you have...
That's the trouble with pesky users: they're always doing something
awkward! :-)
In this case the programmers point of view is very different to the
users.
I have now tried that - although it's not an operational sequence
that I have ever used before (always learning). And it *does* retain
the 100% scale. Thanks, I'll remember that.
The scale is 100% because the frame is exactly the right size (which we
worked out was due to it being embedded). What is interesting is if this
way of replacing the picture fixes the printing problem.
--
David Pilling
email: david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
web: http://www.davidpilling.net
post: David Pilling P.O. Box 22 Thornton Cleveleys Blackpool. FY5 1LR UK
fax: +44(0)870-0520-941
- Follow-Ups:
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre
- References:
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre
Other related posts:
- » [softwarelist] OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
I've not been thinking about this problem the way that you have...
That's the trouble with pesky users: they're always doing something awkward! :-)
I have now tried that - although it's not an operational sequence that I have ever used before (always learning). And it *does* retain the 100% scale. Thanks, I'll remember that.
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre