[softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling <flist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: davidpilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 18:19:55 +0000
In message <4e8f8287aaray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ray Favre
<ray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
I've not been thinking about this problem the way that you have...
If I load the Impression document into Ovation Pro, then find the
*embedded frames* and delete the *frames*, then take one of the pictures
and drop it into the text story (thus creating a new embedded frame)
then yes I get a frame which is about 70% of the size.
However the issue is then how Ovation Pro handles creating embedded
frames compared to how Impression does - there's no reason why they
should be the same. Probably 100% is in this case more useful but 70% is
not a sign of anything being wrong.
I can believe that there is some oddity in the document conversion -
perhaps in the original document or the OP filter that leads to a
corrupt document. Your comment about changing the size might point at
that - again for an *embedded frame* because changing the size of the
*frame* means the document will reflow. Changing the size of a picture
in a fixed frame is by comparison a harmless operation.
To put it another way, you might have tried to do what I thought you
were doing, select the picture in the frame, delete the picture and then
import the picture again into the existing frame.
--
David Pilling
email: david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
web: http://www.davidpilling.net
post: David Pilling P.O. Box 22 Thornton Cleveleys Blackpool. FY5 1LR UK
fax: +44(0)870-0520-941
- Follow-Ups:
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre
- References:
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre
Other related posts:
- » [softwarelist] OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre