[softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre <ray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: davidpilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 11:35:13 +0000 (GMT)
In article <4e8f67c9e7chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Johnson
<chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In article <4e8f649604ray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ray Favre
> <ray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 2) The second issue only arose when trying to solve the above by
> > saving out the graphics as drawfiles from the OPro version;
> > deleting them from the document; then dragging the drawfiles back
> > in. When dragged back in the pics both now appear at 70.55% (!)
> > size rather than their original 100%. Why?
> Was the original pic being clipped by the frame (i.e. only the
> central two thirds actually being displayed)? When OPro imports (or
> reimports) a picture it usually 'scales to fit' the frame.
Thanks for your interest.
No, all the pic contents were/are being shown.
(And the frame in which it is embedded in the text is much wider than
the 100% bounding box size of the graphic.)
> It might be worth loading the original export (sprite in a
> drawfile) into !DPlingScan if you have it, since that will tell you
> the actual size of the sprite, and immediately show whether the
> original sprite has a lot of white space around it.
I've just tried that. There is no extra white space and the size is
as expected (and same as drawfile).
--
Regards from Ray Favre. Email at: <ray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Web site at: <http://www.rayfavre.me.uk/>
Tel: (+44) (0)1895 444410
- References:
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Chris Johnson
Other related posts:
- » [softwarelist] OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Ray Favre
- [softwarelist] Re: OPro 2.76
- From: Chris Johnson