[softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification
- From: "Tonnie-mw Demarteau" <2ndhalf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Ovation Pro" <davidpilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:08:36 +0200
On Tuesday, October 21, 2008 1:34 PM ,
Jhr JMAH van Vredenburch <janvredenburch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In message <48FCFBE3.5020701@xxxxxxxx>
Clive Bonsall <cbonsall@xxxxxxx> wrote:
There appears to be a consistent problem when a line ends in a full
stop, which becomes more evident when there are several such lines close
together. I find that these lines do not always align to the right
margin (neither on screen nor in print). Playing with the enhanced
justification settings fails to rectify the problem.
...
If you look at the size of a full stop in a font editing program you
will see it is slightly more than the diameter of the full stop
itself.
This is also true for other chars. Before and after. This is called the
character width.
When you apply kerning between 2 chars, you change the total width between
outline of 2 characters.
The difference is far greater with Corpus or Evenletter. With these
fonts the full stop will appear exactly in the middle under the last
letter at the end of the line above.
Of course. Both fonts are monospaced. Each character has the same character
width (= space before and space after outline of character and the width of
the character itself). For a full stop there is more space before and after
the outline than for a character like M or W.
What can be seen for the full stop, is also visible for exclamation mark,
comma, colon and semi colon. And maybe other characters. Same for quotation
mark and apostrophe, when used as first char in a line of text.
This isn't wrong. It is essential for a proportional spaced font. Same goes
for height and width of outlines of characters. Several measurements are
'optical' or 'visual' correct, but metrical not. An 'o' or 'p' or 'm' are
higher than an 'i' or 'v' or 'z'. A bow is always metrical higher or wider
than a horizontal or vertical flat part of a character.
Tonnie Demarteau
To unsubscribe or subscribe goto: http://www.freelists.org/list/davidpilling
- References:
- [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification
- From: Clive Bonsall
- [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification
- From: Jhr JMAH van Vredenburch
Other related posts:
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - David Pilling
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - Michael Ben-Gershon
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - Clive Bonsall
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - ralph_valmai
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - Bernard G Hill
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - Steve Fryatt
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - David Pilling
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - Michael Ben-Gershon
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - Ian Platt
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - David Pilling
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - Steve Fryatt
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - Tim Powys-Lybbe
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - David Pilling
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - Anthony Hilton
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - Chris Johnson
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - David Pilling
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - Chris Johnson
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - Tim Powys-Lybbe
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - Ian Platt
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - David Pilling
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - Ron . Briscoe
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - John Tytgat
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - Tim Powys-Lybbe
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification - David Pilling
In message <48FCFBE3.5020701@xxxxxxxx>
Clive Bonsall <cbonsall@xxxxxxx> wrote:
There appears to be a consistent problem when a line ends in a full stop, which becomes more evident when there are several such lines close together. I find that these lines do not always align to the right margin (neither on screen nor in print). Playing with the enhanced justification settings fails to rectify the problem.
If you look at the size of a full stop in a font editing program you will see it is slightly more than the diameter of the full stop itself.
The difference is far greater with Corpus or Evenletter. With these fonts the full stop will appear exactly in the middle under the last letter at the end of the line above.
- [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification
- From: Clive Bonsall
- [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Enhanced justification
- From: Jhr JMAH van Vredenburch