[softwarelist] Re: A Nastie in the system
- From: Steven Pampling <steve.pampling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: davidpilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 17:26:35 +0000 (GMT)
On 09 Mar, Martin Vethake <martinv@xxxxxx> wrote:
> In message <8M49P+ANqDEEFw8I@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> David Pilling
> <flist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > I am getting spam sent to my OvPro email address.
> >
> > Firstly, I have had 1000's of emails from "Barclays" and I don't have
> > an account with them. The same goes for some of the other major
> > banks. As the banks say, do not reply or follow any instructions,
> > some of them are quite tempting.
> >
> [snip] Have to admit I've always felt some sort of moral obligation to
> answer those bank-mails. o.k. I do submit bogus data, but don't those
> poor fellas deserve a bit of attention?
Possibly, but the attention in question probably breaks various legal
conventions regarding human rights.
--
Steve Pampling
- Follow-Ups:
- [softwarelist] Re: A Nastie in the system
- From: Martin Vethake
- References:
- [softwarelist] Re: A Nastie in the system
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: A Nastie in the system
- From: Martin Vethake
Other related posts:
- » [softwarelist] A Nastie in the system
- » [softwarelist] Re: A Nastie in the system
- » [softwarelist] Re: A Nastie in the system
- » [softwarelist] Re: A Nastie in the system
- » [softwarelist] Re: A Nastie in the system
- » [softwarelist] Re: A Nastie in the system
- » [softwarelist] Re: A Nastie in the system
- » [softwarelist] Re: A Nastie in the system
- » [softwarelist] Re: A Nastie in the system
- » [softwarelist] Re: A Nastie in the system
- » [softwarelist] Re: A Nastie in the system
- » [softwarelist] Re: A Nastie in the system
- » [softwarelist] Re: A Nastie in the system
- [softwarelist] Re: A Nastie in the system
- From: Martin Vethake
- [softwarelist] Re: A Nastie in the system
- From: David Pilling
- [softwarelist] Re: A Nastie in the system
- From: Martin Vethake