[CTS] Re: RAM
- From: Hal <hbrown@xxxxxxxx>
- To: computertalkshop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 18:03:54 -0400
At EST 05:40 PM 5/3/2004, - edwestern duly noted:
If this replacement Asus gives me any trouble I'm deep sixing the brand.
They rate tops quite often but as you say only serious oc's need all they
have to offer. With a 64bit processor (& presently little software to use it
on) I don't need a board that will overclock. I just want a board to post &
keep on humming.
Most of mine do just that.
Wouldn't it be nice to build a puter that ran from the
first power on & ran flawlessly?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hal" <hbrown@xxxxxxxx>
To: <computertalkshop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 2:24 PM
Subject: [CTS] Re: RAM
> Just my 2 pennies, but I was ready to quit AMD altogether until I
> discovered something a few months ago. I usually use Asus MBs for just
> about everything, but Asus and AMD do not play well together for some
> reason. Of course this is not true for everyone, but I've had lots of
> problems with this combo. Using other brands of MBs I have no trouble at
> all. From my experience building PCs, I don't think the cheap brands of
> MBs are necessarily bad. I've built at least 10 PCs using a cheap BioStar
> with AMD and so far not one has had any problems, and they are quite fast
> as well. As a matter of fact, I've used other no name MBs and never had a
> problem. I think Asus is more for techies who want to OC, although most
of
> what I've built is Asus.
> I may stop using Asus with Intel as well. Although I've not had problems,
> I recently put together a server with an Intel MB, and I like it much
> better than Asus, especially for this. Let's face it, their all made in
> Taiwan anyway, so....
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.668 / Virus Database: 430 - Release Date: 4/27/2004
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer Talk Shop http://www.computertalkshop.com
Un-subscribe/Vacation, http://www.computertalkshop.com/list_options.htm
List HowTo: http://www.computertalkshop.com/faq.htm
To join Computer Talk Shop's off topic list, please goto:
http://computertalkshop.com/other_cts_lists.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
__________ NOD32 1.748 (20040503) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.nod32.com
--
Hal Brown
http://adwt.com email: hal@xxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer Talk Shop http://www.computertalkshop.com
Un-subscribe/Vacation, http://www.computertalkshop.com/list_options.htm
List HowTo: http://www.computertalkshop.com/faq.htm
To join Computer Talk Shop's off topic list, please goto:
http://computertalkshop.com/other_cts_lists.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- References:
- [CTS] Re: RAM
- From: Russ Blakeman
- [CTS] Re: RAM
- From: edwestern
- [CTS] Re: RAM
- From: Hal
- [CTS] Re: RAM
- From: edwestern
Other related posts:
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
- » [CTS] Re: RAM
If this replacement Asus gives me any trouble I'm deep sixing the brand. They rate tops quite often but as you say only serious oc's need all they have to offer. With a 64bit processor (& presently little software to use it on) I don't need a board that will overclock. I just want a board to post & keep on humming.
Wouldn't it be nice to build a puter that ran from the first power on & ran flawlessly?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Hal" <hbrown@xxxxxxxx> To: <computertalkshop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 2:24 PM Subject: [CTS] Re: RAM
> Just my 2 pennies, but I was ready to quit AMD altogether until I > discovered something a few months ago. I usually use Asus MBs for just > about everything, but Asus and AMD do not play well together for some > reason. Of course this is not true for everyone, but I've had lots of > problems with this combo. Using other brands of MBs I have no trouble at > all. From my experience building PCs, I don't think the cheap brands of > MBs are necessarily bad. I've built at least 10 PCs using a cheap BioStar > with AMD and so far not one has had any problems, and they are quite fast > as well. As a matter of fact, I've used other no name MBs and never had a > problem. I think Asus is more for techies who want to OC, although most of > what I've built is Asus. > I may stop using Asus with Intel as well. Although I've not had problems, > I recently put together a server with an Intel MB, and I like it much > better than Asus, especially for this. Let's face it, their all made in > Taiwan anyway, so....
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.668 / Virus Database: 430 - Release Date: 4/27/2004
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Computer Talk Shop http://www.computertalkshop.com Un-subscribe/Vacation, http://www.computertalkshop.com/list_options.htm
List HowTo: http://www.computertalkshop.com/faq.htm
To join Computer Talk Shop's off topic list, please goto: http://computertalkshop.com/other_cts_lists.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
__________ NOD32 1.748 (20040503) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.nod32.com
-- Hal Brown http://adwt.com email: hal@xxxxxxxx
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Computer Talk Shop http://www.computertalkshop.com Un-subscribe/Vacation, http://www.computertalkshop.com/list_options.htm
- [CTS] Re: RAM
- From: Russ Blakeman
- [CTS] Re: RAM
- From: edwestern
- [CTS] Re: RAM
- From: Hal
- [CTS] Re: RAM
- From: edwestern