[COMP] Re: Windows 2000
- To: <computers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 16:43:21 +1100
> Lately I've been thinking about how Microsoft
> charges for their beta CD's. What was it last
> time, $50 or something? So people were paying
> $50 for bug-riddled software which will intentionally
> cease to function after a few months.
Sounds like Microsoft. I wouldn't pay to test their products - they should
pay me.
I can understand them charging a small fee to distribute the CDs even though
they can probably afford to send them free. But, them making profit from it
is simply outrageous.
> For the time and effort they have contributed by
> using this unstable beta software and sending bug
> reports to Microsoft, the beta testers get ... (drum roll) ...
> absolutely nothing! Not even a discount offer for
> the release version (is this true?)
Yes. This appears to be true.
> I don't understand why people are paying Microsoft
> to do their beta testing for them. Some thoughts:
>
> * By charging people to beta test, isn't Microsoft
> creating a much smaller pool of beta testers?
> If the software was available free (such as on the
> internet or on those MSN CD's), I think there would
> be *alot* more people testing it.
I was given IE4 to test almost a year before MIcrosoft released it to the
public. They sent me a CD with a letter requesting that I test it and let
them know how it was. I did this, but if they were going to charge me to do
work for them - there is no way I would.
I discovered quite a few bugs such as with the Active Desktop freezing
the system, and more.
> What does all of this say about Microsoft's attitude
> toward quality control?
I think their buggy software says enough :)
--Shaun
========================================
Avenir Web's Computers Mailing List
List Modes, Subscription, and General Info:
Go to http://avenir.dhs.org/mailing.html
List Archives: http://avenir.dhs.org/archives/
Administrative Contact: weez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Get computer help: http://avenir.dhs.org
========================================
- References:
- [COMP] Re: Windows 2000
- From: computers
Other related posts:
- » [COMP] Windows 2000
- » [COMP] Re: Windows 2000
- » [COMP] Re: Windows 2000
- » [COMP] Re: Windows 2000
- » [COMP] Re: Windows 2000
- » [COMP] Re: Windows 2000
- » [COMP] Re: Windows 2000
- » [COMP] Re: Windows 2000
- » [COMP] Re: Windows 2000
- » [COMP] Re: Windows 2000
- » [COMP] Re: Windows 2000
- » [COMP] Re: Windows 2000
- » [COMP] Re: Windows 2000
- » [COMP] Re: Windows 2000
- » [COMP] Re: Windows 2000
- [COMP] Re: Windows 2000
- From: computers