[COMP] Re: Mp3 questions answered..
- To: computers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 18:10:27 -0500
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> Yup...wav files are bigger than mp3's and the quality is not as good! I
> found the answers to my queries! :)
Why would the quality not be as good?
The way I see it, when you take that first .wav, ripped from your cd, it's got
the original quality (or at least, 99.99999% of it or something). Compressing
into mpeg3 causes some loss, so you've got, say, 95% of the original quality
(if you've got a good encoder, and use a good bitrate, like 192 or something).
But why would going from mp3 back into .wav cause loss of quality? In other
words, the entire 3-step process causes some degradation, but not that last
step, right? Or is there something I'm missing? :)
John
--
# John Madden weez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ICQ: 2EB9EA
# Sys-Admin / Webmaster, Avenir Web: http://avenir.dhs.org
# LANdb: Network Admin Database - http://avenir.dhs.org/landb/
# NCPweb: Web-based frontend to ncpfs - http://avenir.dhs.org/ncpweb/
# Linux, Apache, Perl and C: All the best things in life are free!
========================================
Avenir Web's Computers Mailing List
List Modes, Subscription, and General Info:
Go to http://avenir.dhs.org/mailing.html
List Archives: http://avenir.dhs.org/archives/
Administrative Contact: weez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Get computer help: http://avenir.dhs.org
========================================
- References:
- [COMP] Mp3 questions answered..
- From: computers
Other related posts:
- » [COMP] Mp3 questions answered..
- » [COMP] Re: Mp3 questions answered..
- » [COMP] Re: Mp3 questions answered..
- » [COMP] Re: Mp3 questions answered..
- » [COMP] Re: Mp3 questions answered..
- » [COMP] Re: Mp3 questions answered..
- [COMP] Mp3 questions answered..
- From: computers