[COMP] Re: Fw: Bill 602P e-mail charges
- To: <computers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2000 12:38:50 -0400
It was brought to my attention that this was a hoax.
I read the post on UMBC
University of Md Baltimore Campus
Linux group.
The overwhelming majority of posts to that list are
super serious- extreme super techno geek...
very much like slashdot.
(waaaaay over my head in other words)
I have never seen a bogus post to that list...
well many of them are college kids.
Seems one of them got the best of me on this one.
I immediately posted to everyone I knew Like I
was Paul Revere!
I wanted to mobilize the troops before Monday morning.
My father also pointed out to me that
Senate Bills end with a S
House Bills end with a H
duh.
Ok then, I was Paul Revere...except that this time-
the British weren't coming :(
David
----- Original Message -----
#From: "Michael V. Franklin" <slavo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <computers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2000 11:05 AM
Subject: [COMP] Re: Fw: Bill 602P e-mail charges
| This is ridiculous, you already get charged for email by paying for an ISP.
| The post office has nothing to do with electronic transfer of anything
| except their own email. The only people that could charge for something
| like this is your ISP. Please read this kind of junk email with a grain of
| salt.
|
| http://www.usps.gov/news/press/99/99045new.htm
|
| Mike
|
| -----Original Message-----
| From: computers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| [mailto:computers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Bruce, Jr.
| Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2000 4:25 AM
| To: computers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Subject: [COMP] Fw: Bill 602P e-mail charges
|
|
| ----- Original Message -----
| From: "Paul Croft" <pcroft@xxxxxxxxx>
| To: "Vince Rhea" <vintage@xxxxxxxxxx>; "UMBC LUG"
| <umbclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Tracy Shaw" <tracys@xxxxxxxxx>; "Tom Zinzi"
| <zinzi@xxxxxxxxxx>; "Tom Beeson" <thomas.beeson@xxxxxxxxxxx>; "Tom & Mary
| Croft" <crofthome@xxxxxxxxx>; "Teres" <teres@xxxxxxxx>; "Susan Kifer"
| <susankifer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Steve Hellams"
| <SHellams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Stan Gorak" <sgorak@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Sound
| Practice" <sp@xxxxxxxxxx>; "Sheldon D. Stokes" <stokes@xxxxxxxx>; "Ron
| Wellborne" <wlabs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Rosemary Croft"
| <rosemarycroft@xxxxxxxxx>; "Rich Rosato" <rich.rosato@xxxxxxxxx>; "Phil
| Malmstrom" <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Paul & Fran Supina"
| <paul.supina@xxxxxxxxxxx>; "Pat & Tom Brown" <Pat.Brown[gede@xxxxxxxxx]>;
| "Mike Babb" <MBabb@xxxxxxxxxx>; "Michael D'Arienzo" <emmm@xxxxxx>; "Martin
| Morrell" <martin.morrell@xxxxxxxxxxx>; "Mark Iannuzzi" <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>;
| "Kimberly Usilton" <sycamore.nursery@xxxxxxx>; "Kevin McHugh"
| <kevin.mchugh@xxxxxxxxx>; "Katie Croft" <croft@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Judy Julis"
| <judith.julis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "John Randolph" <misco@xxxxxxxxx>;
| "JoeNet" <ride5000@xxxxxxxxxxx>; "Joe Croft" <croftj@xxxxxxxxxx>; "Jim
| Cross" <vactubes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Jeffery R. Randall"
| <Jeff_Randall@xxxxxxxx>; "Jeff Butler" <Trainmn1@xxxxxxx>; "Harriett Cauley"
| <harriett.cauley@xxxxxxxxxxx>; "Hans Lomar" <hlohmar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
| "Dwight Bragg" <dbragg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Dell Computer - Jeff Randall"
| <Jeff_Randall@xxxxxxxx>; "Debbie Hawryliak" <fallingstar80@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
| "Deane Gutman" <dgutman@xxxxxxx>; "Dan Wiggins"
| <DanWiggins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Chip Layfield" <Lchip@xxxxxxx>; "Brian
| Bishop" <BBishop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Bob Ash" <abs@xxxxxxxxx>; "Bill & Outi
| Denny" <wdenny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2000 5:58 AM
| Subject: FW: Bill 602P e-mail charges
|
|
| | Hi folks,
| | I just received this from a friend. I think it is important that we call
| our
| | senators and representatives and see if we can nip this in the bud. Leave
| it
| | to the government and I guess we would be subsidizing buggy whip makers,
| as
| | well.
| | Please call or write to your Reps, folks!
| | Cheers,
| | Paul
| |
| | -----Original Message-----
| | Subject: Bill 602P e-mail charges
| |
| |
| | VOTE NO ON Bill 602P!!!!
| |
| | I guess the warnings were true. Federal Bill
| | 602P 5-cents per E-mail Sent. It figures! No more free
| | E-mail! We knew this was coming! Bill 602P will
| | permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent
| | charge on every delivered E-mail.
| |
| | Please read the following carefully if you
| | intend to stay online, and continue using E-mail. The
| | last few months have revealed an alarming trend in the
| | Government of the United States attempting to quietly
| | push through legislation that will affect our use of
| | the Internet.
| |
| | Under proposed legislation, the US Postal
| | Service will be attempting to bill E-mail users out of
| | "alternative postage fees." Bill 602P will permit the
| | Federal Government to charge a 5-cent surcharge on
| | every E-mail delivered, by billing Internet Service
| | Providers at source. The consumer would then be billed
| | in turn by the ISP.
| |
| | Washington, DC lawyer Richard Stepp is
| | working without pay to prevent this legislation from
| | becoming law. The US Postal Service is claiming lost
| | revenue, due to the proliferation of E-mail, is
| | costing nearly $230,000,000 in revenue per year. You
| | may have noticed their recent ad campaign: "There is
| | nothing like a letter."
| |
| | Since the average person received about 10
| | pieces of E-mail per day in 1998, the cost of the
| | typical individual would be an additional 50 cents a
| | day-or over $180 per year-above and beyond their
| | regular Internet costs. Note that this would be money
| | paid directly to the US Postal Service for a service
| | they do not even provide. The whole point of the
| | Internet is democracy and noninterference. You are
| | already paying an exorbitant price for snail mail
| | because of bureaucratic efficiency. It currently takes
| | up to 6 days for a letter to be delivered from coast
| | to coast. If the US Postal Service is allowed to
| | tinker with E-mail, it will mark the end of the "free"
| | Internet in the United States. Our congressional
| | representative, Tony Schnell (r) has even suggested a
| | "$20-$40 per month surcharge on all Internet service"
| | above and beyond the governments proposed E-mail
| | charges
| |
| | Note that most of the major newspapers have
| | ignored the story-the only exception being the
| | Washingtonian - which called the idea of E-mail
| | surcharge "a useful concept who's time has come"
| | (March 6th, 1999 Editorial).
| |
| | Do not sit by and watch your freedom erode
| | away! Send this E-mail to EVERYONE on your list,
| | and tell all your friends and relatives write their
| | congressional representative and say "NO" to Bill
| | 602P. It will only take a few moments of your time and
| | could very well be instrumental in killing a bill we
| | do not want.
| |
| | Please forward!
| |
| | ***********************************************************
| | You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to
| | the list "UMBCLINUX". To unsubscribe, send an email to
| | "listproc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" with the message(not subject):
| | unsub UMBCLINUX
| |
|
|
| Avenir Web's Computers Mailing List
|
| List Modes, Subscription, and General Info:
| Go to http://avenir.dhs.org/mailing.html
| List Archives: http://avenir.dhs.org/archives/
| Administrative Contact: weez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Get computer help: http://avenir.dhs.org
|
|
| ========================================
| Avenir Web's Computers Mailing List
|
| List Modes, Subscription, and General Info:
| Go to http://avenir.dhs.org/mailing.html
| List Archives: http://avenir.dhs.org/archives/
| Administrative Contact: weez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Get computer help: http://avenir.dhs.org
| ========================================
=======================================Avenir Web's Computers Mailing List
List Modes, Subscription, and General Info:
Go to http://avenir.dhs.org/mailing.html
List Archives: http://avenir.dhs.org/archives/
Administrative Contact: weez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Get computer help: http://avenir.dhs.org
=======================================
- References:
- [COMP] Re: Fw: Bill 602P e-mail charges
- From: computers
Other related posts:
- » [COMP] Fw: Bill 602P e-mail charges
- » [COMP] Re: Fw: Bill 602P e-mail charges
- » [COMP] Re: Fw: Bill 602P e-mail charges
- » [COMP] Re: Fw: Bill 602P e-mail charges
- » [COMP] Re: Fw: Bill 602P e-mail charges
- » [COMP] Re: Fw: Bill 602P e-mail charges
- [COMP] Re: Fw: Bill 602P e-mail charges
- From: computers