[cad-linux] Re: vi or emacs bindings for cad
- From: john kosty <john_kosty@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cad-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 03:15:38 -0800 (PST)
I would love to use Vi -- but only because I'm
familiar with it. Until going through a few tutorials
it confused the hell out of me [--I was too lazy to
use a manual having used M$ Notepad for a decade.] We
would need a third option along these lines as most
merely wish to enter commands. No cryptic keystroke
macros -- until they are ready for "the next step."
My $.02,
jk
--- Eric Wilhelm <ewilhelm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> the autocad command-entry model is nice, but what
> about a modal setup like vi?
> I figure that by the time you get done writing a cad
> application from
> scratch, you are going to be more used to vi or
> emacs than the
> what-you-type-is-what-you-see model.
>
> --Eric
> --
> Cult: A small, unpopular religion.
> Religion: A large, popular cult.
> -- Unknown
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [cad-linux] Re: vi or emacs bindings for cad
- From: Janek Kozicki
- References:
- [cad-linux] vi or emacs bindings for cad
- From: Eric Wilhelm
Other related posts:
- » [cad-linux] vi or emacs bindings for cad
- » [cad-linux] Re: vi or emacs bindings for cad
- » [cad-linux] Re: vi or emacs bindings for cad
- [cad-linux] Re: vi or emacs bindings for cad
- From: Janek Kozicki
- [cad-linux] vi or emacs bindings for cad
- From: Eric Wilhelm