[cad-linux] Re: reply from TomCAD owner
- From: marrandy <marrandy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: cad-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 14:03:26 -0500
On Sunday 19 January 2003 01:45 pm, you wrote:
> If you're intending on emailing the information to the author, it'll
> help to include a little bit of background information like:
> * which distribution you're using
> * which rpm you downloaded
> * your qt version
> * your python version
> ...just in case he's not seen the error before.
>
> Guy
In this case, no. I'm not.
It just shows the current state of the products.
Plus why there should be a concentration on Two, at the most.
I need something I can use efficiently and effectively. Otherwise, I might as
well get a decent windows offering.
- Follow-Ups:
- [cad-linux] Re: reply from TomCAD owner
- From: Guy Edwards
- References:
- [cad-linux] Re: 2D versus 3D thoughts: list of candidates
- From: phrostie
- [cad-linux] Re: reply from TomCAD owner
- From: marrandy
- [cad-linux] Re: reply from TomCAD owner
- From: Guy Edwards
Other related posts:
- » [cad-linux] reply from TomCAD owner
- » [cad-linux] Re: reply from TomCAD owner
- » [cad-linux] Re: reply from TomCAD owner
- » [cad-linux] Re: reply from TomCAD owner
- » [cad-linux] Re: reply from TomCAD owner
- » [cad-linux] Re: reply from TomCAD owner
- » [cad-linux] Re: reply from TomCAD owner
- » [cad-linux] Re: reply from TomCAD owner
- » [cad-linux] Re: reply from TomCAD owner
- » [cad-linux] Re: reply from TomCAD owner
- [cad-linux] Re: reply from TomCAD owner
- From: Guy Edwards
- [cad-linux] Re: 2D versus 3D thoughts: list of candidates
- From: phrostie
- [cad-linux] Re: reply from TomCAD owner
- From: marrandy
- [cad-linux] Re: reply from TomCAD owner
- From: Guy Edwards