[cad-linux] Re: intellicad
- From: phrostie <pfrostie@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cad-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 22:00:47 -0400
i would no more suggest that your project is a waste of time than i would
tell them not to bother. they have good intentions. and i hope they come
through, but i don't think that we can hold our breath and wait on any one
project. I think that you are doing exactly what needs to be done. I also
hope some of the other projects on sourceforge combine and come to life.
there is no one cad package that fills everyones needs. I think that there
will be room for groups like the ITC., varicad and a few true opensource
projects like Qcad and your's as well.
and yes intellicad does rely heavily on MFC's
that's what's stoping a winelib port. there is no complete free MFC
replacement.
On Tuesday 28 August 2001 20:27, you wrote:
> Well that sort of makes my project a waste of time. They might be able to
> pull it off, the only parts of a drawing definition that are really
> embedded into windows are the various SYSVAR's that are stored in the
> registry and not with the drawing. Everything else linked to windows is
> just user interface, but there is a TON of it!!!
>
> When I was working on my viewer program I choose QT because their libraries
> did a lot of the interfacing with the operating system for drawing vector
> display, dialog boxes and the like. I expect IntelliCad has the same
> intertwining by using the Microsoft MFC libraries. Good luck to them
> pulling it apart.
>
> Andy
- References:
- [cad-linux] Re: intellicad
- From: AJBIBB
Other related posts:
- » [cad-linux] intellicad
- » [cad-linux] Re: intellicad
- » [cad-linux] Re: intellicad
- » [cad-linux] Re: intellicad
- » [cad-linux] Re: intellicad
- » [cad-linux] Re: intellicad
- [cad-linux] Re: intellicad
- From: AJBIBB