[cad-linux] Re: .dxf or .dwg?
- From: Eric Wilhelm <ewilhelm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: cad-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 18:23:58 -0500
> The following was supposedly scribed by
> Lee Harding
> on Friday 22 August 2003 10:36 am:
>Once you have the geometry (and later the g-code) in the database, you
>can:
> -- back it up
> -- share it via web applications
> -- version it
> -- search it
> -- integrate it with whatever business systems you have
Not to mention that your networked database can also be used to store machine
setup-information so that the gcode is tied to a setup definition. This
allows the machine operator to easily determine the required tooling (which
would be super helpful in something like a turret-punch.)
You also create a well-defined but randomly accessible set of data that can be
used by multiple programs, and (if your library is GPL), you could possibly
have data much smarter than dxf loaded directly to the database by the cad
application.
Think pro-engineer + pro-nc, but in the unix style, where you have multiple
specialized programs that can all talk to each other.
--Eric
- Follow-Ups:
- [cad-linux] alternatives to opencascade
- From: Sagar Behere
- References:
- [cad-linux] Re: .dxf or .dwg?
- From: Lee Harding
Other related posts:
- » [cad-linux] .dxf or .dwg?
- » [cad-linux] Re: .dxf or .dwg?
- » [cad-linux] Re: .dxf or .dwg?
- » [cad-linux] Re: .dxf or .dwg?
- » [cad-linux] Re: .dxf or .dwg?
- » [cad-linux] Re: .dxf or .dwg?
- » [cad-linux] Re: .dxf or .dwg?
- » [cad-linux] Re: .dxf or .dwg?
- » [cad-linux] Re: .dxf or .dwg?
- » [cad-linux] Re: .dxf or .dwg?
- » [cad-linux] Re: .dxf or .dwg?
- » [cad-linux] Re: .dxf or .dwg?
- » [cad-linux] Re: .dxf or .dwg?
- [cad-linux] alternatives to opencascade
- From: Sagar Behere
- [cad-linux] Re: .dxf or .dwg?
- From: Lee Harding