[cad-linux] Status of BRL-CAD development (was Re: test)
- From: Christopher Sean Morrison <brlcad@xxxxxxx>
- To: cad-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 13:27:52 -0400
Things have been pretty busy with the BRL-CAD project with lots of
interesting parallel development efforts in progress. I've not had
the time to send out our usual updates and announcements to the cad-
linux mailing lists of late simply because we've been busy working to
make things better. For those wondering what we're working on,
though, our main development priorities are predominantly focused in
four main areas which you can read about at http://brlcad.org/BRL-
CAD_Priorities.png (727KB PNG). That should give folks a good idea
for what our roadmap and priorities look like for the next couple years.
A couple new developers have joined the team recently and are quickly
getting up to speed with the codebase. You can see one of the latest
offerings from them on our website ( http://brlcad.org ) that came
out of one individual's *training* nonetheless, where the developer
made a really nice automatic and accurate implicit tire generation
tool. We've also been making great progress on our BREP/NURBS
implementation along with major effort going into refactoring our
sources for a new editor interface.
Also noteworthy, we're just finishing up our run in the 2008 Google
Summer of Code. It was an outstanding summer where we had four
students working hard on various projects for BRL-CAD. I intend to
send out more details about how that went later but some highlights
of that effort are that we now have a new modeler interface under
development, several new primitives implemented, and the beginnings
of comprehensive parametric equation support for constraints. Since
the program was so successful, this is something we'll likely
continue to participate in as a source for new features and (more
importantly) new developer talent.
Lots of folks (and I do mean lots) have made it very clear that they
want a better graphical user interface for BRL-CAD. We've known this
for years and are working on making things drastically different and
much better. We're a very large solid modeling package, though, with
a *lot* of functionality that the new interface needs to support. We
of course will do things incrementally, but there is still a whole
lot of ground work required. We're also in production use, so we're
very careful about testing everything to make sure our
representations are accurate, robust, and high-performance. It's
going to take a while to do things right.
Cheers!
Sean
p.s. The BRL-CAD_Priorities image is a work-in-progress and likely
will change, but the content is still pretty solid (no pun
intended). If you'd like to help out, whether you are a developer or
not, please do get in touch.
On Sep 13, 2008, at 4:55 AM, Patrick McLaughlin wrote:
> I'm still interested, but not as a coder - primarily want to know
> what is
> available and/or coming down the pipe in Linux based CAD
>
> Pat McLaughlin
> Alberta, Canada
>
>
> On September 10, 2008 06:16 pm, Moises CastrOporto wrote:
>> Maybe active but only a little :)
>> mOe:)
>> 2008/9/10 john kosty <john_kosty@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>> Testing...
>>> this group still active?
>>>
>>> John Kosty
>>> 828 Ralph McGill Boulevard
>>> Atlanta, Georgia 30306
>>> 404.447.3608
>>> john_kosty@xxxxxxxxx
>
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [cad-linux] test
- From: john kosty
- [cad-linux] Re: test
- From: Moises CastrOporto
- [cad-linux] Re: test
- From: Patrick McLaughlin
Other related posts:
- » [cad-linux] Status of BRL-CAD development (was Re: test)
- » [cad-linux] Re: Status of BRL-CAD development (was Re: test)
- » [cad-linux] Re: Status of BRL-CAD development (was Re: test)
- [cad-linux] test
- From: john kosty
- [cad-linux] Re: test
- From: Moises CastrOporto
- [cad-linux] Re: test
- From: Patrick McLaughlin