[cad-linux] Re: OT: Open data formats (continuation of previous thread)

Allegory, although interesting, doesn't provide the detached perspective I 
think is necessary in the search for a solution.  You've indicated assumed 
drawbacks with ownership of a standards by public corporations interested in 
the market -- perhaps because the officers obligation to act in the interest of 
the firm must clash with the interests of the firm's customers.  I don't 
believe that's true, but let's assume it is.

The alternative of standards ownership by public corporations (non-profit, or 
otherwise) with _no_ interest in the market would assumedly have drawbacks as 
well.  First of all, the officers of a non-profit are under equal obligation to 
the firm as there for-profit brethren.  I'm familiar with the operation of 
several non-profits (education funds, private charitable trusts, etc.) and I 
can tell you they concentrate very seriously on self-preservation.  It can only 
do good so long as it exists.  Secondly, lacking direct interest in the market 
the owners may easily be distracted (or disinterested) in advancing the users' 
good in an aggressive manner.

A specific problem has been presented: how to preserve access to data over the 
very long term.  I don't know the solution, but I'm working on it.  I think DWF 
is a well-designed solution given my understanding of the problem.  My fear is 
that 5 years down the road we may discover that our solution of today is wrong 
-- it isn't in my companies interest to invest in something that won't work.  
Neither is it in our users' interest.  That's why I'm on this list.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeffrey McGrew [mailto:JMcGrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: September 23, 2002 10:57 AM
> To: cad-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cad-linux] Re: OT: Open data formats (continuation 
> of previous
> thread)
> 
> 
> 
> > So where does something like Autodesk's DWF format fit in=20
> > this discussion of data retirement/availability?
> 
> I think it's the same as PDF; whereas it's a OPENLY DISCUSSED 
> standard, =
> but NOT an OPEN STANDARD.
> 
> What I mean by this is that fact that everything you say that 
> DWF can =
...snip...
> that's why I'm researching open software; it behaves like the other =
> things in my life do.=20
> 
> Jeffrey McGrew=20
> 

Other related posts: