[cad-linux] Re: EULA vs. GPL
- From: "Robert Davis, AIA" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: cad-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 12:50:09 -0700
As a professional who makes a living with CAD, I just want the most
robust CAD solution available on Linux. To my knowledge, there are no
native Linux CAD solutions suitable for architecture. The type of
license is less important to me than the ability to transition entirely
to Linux and be freed from Microsoft.
Rob Davis, AIA
john kosty wrote:
>"...it's hard for me to get excited about yet one more player on the CAD field
>that presents me with a EULA and doesn't mention the GPL."
>
- Follow-Ups:
- [cad-linux] Re: EULA vs. GPL
- From: Herman Bruyninckx
- References:
- [cad-linux] Re: GraphiteOne 1.2 Release
- From: john kosty
Other related posts:
- » [cad-linux] Re: EULA vs. GPL
- » [cad-linux] Re: EULA vs. GPL
- [cad-linux] Re: EULA vs. GPL
- From: Herman Bruyninckx
- [cad-linux] Re: GraphiteOne 1.2 Release
- From: john kosty