Hi, Cindy. No, you're right. We get 100 books per month, but as I just said in another message, the book counter can be reset, so even the 100 isn't a written-in-stone limit. Take care. Julie Morales Email and Windows/MSN Messenger: inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx When God puts a tear in your eye, it is because He wants to put a rainbow in your heart. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cindy" <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx> To: <bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 5:51 PM Subject: [bookshare-discuss] OOOps! I spoke out of turn OOOps -- Not until I hit send did I realize you said per month. I think the 100 is per year. But I should "butt out" and let other people answer who know more than I. Sorry. Cindy -- Brenda Mueller <brendin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > My impression is that I, as an individual subscriber > can download 20 books a month. When I'm working, > that's not going to happen, but when I'm home, > snowed in with the power out, boy, can I read. > Voice note works on batteries. When the power is > out, I turn to Bookshare. > > Brenda Mueller > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >From: Cindy <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx > >To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:32:58 -0700 (PDT) > >Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Do these books get > read before being submitted? > > >Julie, > > >Hopefully you read my reply to boomerdad, but in > case > >not -- be sure to notify Jesse that the book is > >unreadable all the way through. > > >BTW, Jesse -- when a member downloads a book from > the > >collection that he/she can't enjoy, do they get a > >credit for the book, so it doesn't count against > their > >limit of 50 (or whatever?) > > >Cindy > >--- "J.M." <inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> I can relate to this. Last night, I was reading > one > >> of the Left Behind > >> books. I was over halfway done with the book when > I > >> encountered pure junk. > >> Nothing made sense. I kept scrolling through, > trying > >> to find where I left > >> off or at least somewhere where the text started > >> making sense, but no luck. > >> I was so frustrated! It irritates me when you get > >> into a book and not > >> realize it has some junk pages until you've > already > >> gotten into it. I guess > >> I'll be downloading this copy from Web braille, > as I > >> know they have the > >> whole series, but it is frustrating. Take care. > >> Julie Morales > >> Email and Windows/MSN Messenger: > >> inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> When God puts a tear in your eye, it is because > He > >> wants to put a rainbow in > >> your heart. > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "boomerdad" <boomerdad@xxxxxxxxxxxx > >> To: <bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 3:12 AM > >> Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Do these books get > read > >> before being submitted? > > > >> After having some difficulty scanning Wizard and > >> Glass by Stephen King (I > >> think Openbook doesn't like scanning big books > when > >> set to scan page layout > >> elements, but that's a whole other topic for > another > >> list), I downloaded WIG > >> from Bookshare and began to read. My first > finding > >> was that the entire book > >> was double-spaced. I was a bit irritated, but I > >> figured well, maybe there > >> was a problem either in converting the book to > the > >> Bookshare format, or > >> maybe when Openbook loaded it as an .ark file > >> something happened. I > >> figured, well, I can just manually fix this as I > >> read. No big. Then I came > >> up on a page that is completely and totally > garbled, > >> beyond any ability to > >> recognize what the text is supposed to be. There > >> are ^ symbols all over the > >> place, and other oddities. Granted, the book is > >> over 600 pages long, and > >> that may be the only page like this ... I stopped > >> reading in disgust and > >> opted to try re-scanning this mammoth with > Openbook. > >> I have yet to do so; > >> that's tomorrow's t > >> hree-plus-hour task. My question is: If the > person > >> read this before > >> submitting it, why not re-scan the offending > >> page(s)? And if the submitting > >> person didn't read it before submitting ... why > >> submit something you haven't > >> read yourself? It just seems like an awfully big > >> leap of faith to do this; > >> I've done it twice, and both times I was, > >> thankfully, given the opportunity > >> to make "corrections" in the form of rescanning > >> pages that had > >> unintelligible material. Once I was able to take > >> advantage of the > >> opportunity, once I wasn't ... but it taught me a > >> very valuable lesson, as > >> was reinforced by my Wizard and Glass experience. > >> Besides, if you read > >> something before submitting it, you get a chance > to > >> edit out the errors of a > >> scan and submit a near-perfect to perfect copy of > >> your book. > >> It occurs to me as I write this that maybe the > >> offending page could've been > >> caused by Openbook somehow, as I've encountered > >> garbled pages like this when > >> scanning with Finereader from time to time. I > find > >> this unlikely, though, > >> since so far as I know, Openbook merely reads > from > >> the Daisy-formatted book, > >> and doesn't "convert" it to anything. > > >> The only possible objection to this > >> read-before-submitting thing that comes > >> readily to mind is "Well, if we did that, many > fewer > >> books would be > >> available," to which I reply that while this is > >> true, the quality of said > >> books would be more consistent, more likely than > >> not, and would lead to many > >> more satisfying reading experiences. I submit > many > >> more books to > >> Bookshare.org than I personally download, mainly > >> because I've found from my > >> experiences that downloading a book from > Bookshare > >> is a rather hit-and-miss > >> experience. > > >> I also want to hasten to add that I am not in any > >> way flaming the individual > >> who submitted Wizard and Glass. As I said, I've > had > >> this happen myself to > >> two of my submissions, so the question is more or > >> less hypothetical; I was > >> merely relating my experience, which happened to > >> involve that particular > >> book. > > >> If this post has had a harsh edge to it, I assure > >> you it's not intentional. > >> I am frustrated, and that has probably carried > over > >> into my writing, despite > >> my attempts to prevent it from doing so. I > already > >> have scanned the book > >> twice unsuccessfully because of the > affore-mentioned > >> page-layout problem in > >> OpenBook, and the idea of scanning it *again* is > ... > >> well ... frustrating. > >> I thought about just trying to re-scan any > >> problematic pages ... but the > >> Bookshare pages and Openbook's page divisions > don't > >> line up, so I'd have to > >> do all sorts of cutting and pasting and deleting > and > >> ... yikes...! I think > >> if my problem had just been with garbled pages, > I'd > >> do it, but since I would > >> have to delete all those blank lines as I read > the > >> Bookshare version ... > >> I'll try scanning it one. more. time. with the > >> page-layout feature turned > >> off and hope for better results. > > >> If nothing else, thanks for listening to > (reading) > >> me vent. I realize > >> Bookshare is a voluntary program, and its > existence > >> is a wonderful thing; > >> that's why I've joined it, and that's why I > submit > >> books I read. I just > >> wish that when downloading a book to read from > >> Bookshare, I could be more > >> secure in the knowledge that I won't have to > worry > >> about encountering > >> incomprehensible garbage that makes me guess at > what > >> occurred in passages of > >> a book. > > > > > > > >__________________________________________________ > >Do You Yahoo!? > >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > >http://mail.yahoo.com > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail