Oh yeah, neospeak is very clear, but again, if you pump up the speed I can't understand a word beyond like 300wpm. Also, if you have a lot of scanning errors, watch out because it goes really wild trying to pronounce things. lol ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shelley L. Rhodes" <juddysbuddy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 1:46 PM Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Book Port > Wow, speed reader. I am usually at 200 wpm, smile. > > I have experienced the Echo, though and believe Double Talk is much much, > much better! > > Take my word for it! > > Smile. > > Though for functionality, and ease of listening I still love Keysoft and > Keynote Gold as my prefered synths. followed by the ATT Naturals and maybe > Voice Craft's neospeech. > > > > Shelley L. Rhodes and Judson, guiding golden > juddysbuddy@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Guide Dogs For the Blind Inc. > Graduate Advisory Council > www.guidedogs.com > > The vision must be followed by the venture. It is not enough to > stare up the steps - we must step up the stairs. > > -- Vance Havner > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tiffany H. Jessen" <tjessen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 1:08 PM > Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Book Port > > > I have heard of all of these, but don't believe I've heard them speak. I > didn't come into computers until 1998, and at that point I had and still use > Eloquence. I do have a Software version of Doubletalk and an external > Doubletalk LT for my rare uses of DOS, but I too don't like DOS, so to deal > with both it and the doubletalk at the same time I'm ready to go insane. I > guess I can understand the doubletalk fine enough, but it has to be slowed > to at least a third, if not a quarter of the speed I use eloquence. That > alone drives me nutso. > I don't know how to convert JAWS's speech rate to words per minute, but I > know I use it at 95% of it's capabilities. With Kurzweil I do sometimes use > Dectalk, but mostly I prefer the IBM Via Voice or TTS thing. If I'm just > reading, most of the time I have Kurzweil pumping words out around 720 WPM, > but if I'm editing something I slow it down to around 600. > Even if the doubletalk were able to pump out speeds like that, I would have > no chance of understanding it because I know I can't understand it at the > speeds it does do. > Tiff > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <talmage@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: <bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 12:10 PM > Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Book Port > > > > Hi Tiff, > > > > As with anything, I guess it is all just a matter of preference. > > I am a bit ashamed to admit that the DoubleTalk is my favorite > > synthesizer. After dealing with a Vert, Echo, Slotbuster, Apollo, and > > DecTalk, I have grown very accustomed to the Doubletalk and fortunately > > tend to prefer it. > > > > Dave > > > > At 11:31 AM 1/24/2005, you wrote: > > >I have one and enjoy it very much. Once set of double A batteries last > more > > >than sixty hours. It also supports brf daisy two, rtf and a few other > > >mainstreamed formats. The only thing I don't like is the doubletalk > speech, > > >which I find one of the worst synthesizers made, but the competitor > products > > >use the same synth, so that is not a matter of comparison between them. > > >If you have any particular questions you can email me at > > >tjessen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >Also, there is a listserve where people are very helpful. If you would > like > > >it's subscribing info I'll look it up. > > >Tiff > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: "Scott Duck" <sduck@xxxxxxxxx> > > >To: <bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 10:21 AM > > >Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Book Port > > > > > > > > > > I am thinking about getting a Book Port. This is a portable device, > > >available from APH, for reading txt, html, daisy, Word, wav, mp3, and > some > > >other file formats. Do any of you have a Book Port and what kind of > > >experience have you had with it? Thanks in advance for the feed back. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.1 - Release Date: 1/19/2005 > > > > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.1 - Release Date: 1/19/2005 > >