Me too; I am not asking that that be changed at all. -----Original Message----- From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Walt Smith Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 11:24 AM To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bookport] Re: question and suggestion I agree completely with Chris on this one, as long as we're counting = noses.=20 <g> I felt that not having to listen to all the other information when = all I=20 actually wanted was the percentage I've read was a big improvement and I = really like it. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Chris G" <chrisg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 7:22 AM Subject: [bookport] Re: question and suggestion hi, i disagree about the 8 key. leave it as is. if i want all info, and i know i want all info, i'm just going to hit = the 8=3D for one beep. if i wanted the % in your suggestion, i would need to hit = 8,=3D then hold 8 for one beep to get the rest. Chris *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 9/14/2004 at 11:40 PM Barrett, Don wrote: >1. Have the one-beep 7 and 9 keys for reading sections been disabled = in=3D =3D3D >favor of the new section and subsection reading keys? > >2. This may be picky, but I think it could really refine the info we = get=3D =3D3D >from the eight key. If hit while reading, we just get the percent = read=3D =3D3D >which is wonderful. But if held down for one beep, we get the rest of = =3D3D >the stats which is great but have to hear the percent read again. How = =3D3D >about eliminating the redundant percent read from the one-beep feature = =3D3D >of the eight key. That way, you have the most efficient use of each = =3D3D >function without repetition. > >Don