[bookport] Re: Senneiser PX100 headphones vs. Senneiser PX100 headphones
- From: Peter Rand <peter.rand@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 19:29:02 +0100
Thanks, Rick, an excellent tip.
Peter
Rick Alfaro wrote:
>Hello.
>
>Below are 2 links to information regarding both of these models from
>www.headphone.com
>
>The bottom line is that the px200 is a closed headphone design where the
>px100 is an open design. Follow these links and you can read their
>opinion. Personally, I am glad I have the px100 and not the other.
>PX100
>http://www.headphone.com/layout.php?topicID=3D3&subTopicID=3D26&productID=
>=3D002008
>0010
>
>PX200
>http://www.headphone.com/layout.php?topicID=3D3&subTopicID=3D26&productID=
>=3D002008
>0020
>
>Best regards,
>=20
>Rick Alfaro
>ralfaro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx =
>[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>On Behalf Of Peter Rand
>Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 1:53 PM
>To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [bookport] Senneiser PX100 headphones vs. Senneiser PX100
>headphones
>
>
>A lot of people on this list have recommended the Sennheiser PX100=20
>folding headphones,
>which made me curious enough to do a search for them on the web.
>
>Most of the websites selling the PX100's also sell Sennheiser PX200=20
>headphones, which I
>think are $10 or $15 more than the PX100's.
>
>For the life of me, I can't figure out what the difference is between=20
>these two models - I would
>be interested if anyone could explain the differences between the=20
>PX100's and the PX200's.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Peter
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
