[bookport] Re: Rolling back to Book Port Transfer version 2.20
- From: "David Allen" <wd8ldy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 14:32:16 +1200
Hi Al and list:
The beta that didn't work well was a very rare circumstance. I used all the
betas in the prior beta cycle quite willingly and happily. To their credit,
they were on top of this one very quickly.
Cheers,
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "ALGAYZAG" <ALGAYZAG@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 1:00 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Rolling back to Book Port Transfer version 2.20
I have run into the same problem with the 64 beta. That should and will
teach me to stay away from beta versions.
Al Gayzagian algayzag@xxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- [bookport] Rolling back to Book Port Transfer version 2.20
- From: Steve Cutway
- [bookport] Re: Rolling back to Book Port Transfer version 2.20
- From: ALGAYZAG
Other related posts:
- » [bookport] Rolling back to Book Port Transfer version 2.20
- » [bookport] Re: Rolling back to Book Port Transfer version 2.20
- » [bookport] Re: Rolling back to Book Port Transfer version 2.20
- » [bookport] Re: Rolling back to Book Port Transfer version 2.20
- » [bookport] Re: Rolling back to Book Port Transfer version 2.20
- » [bookport] Re: Rolling back to Book Port Transfer version 2.20
- » [bookport] Re: Rolling back to Book Port Transfer version 2.20
I have run into the same problem with the 64 beta. That should and will teach me to stay away from beta versions. Al Gayzagian algayzag@xxxxxxxxxxx
- [bookport] Rolling back to Book Port Transfer version 2.20
- From: Steve Cutway
- [bookport] Re: Rolling back to Book Port Transfer version 2.20
- From: ALGAYZAG