Chop chop (there goes your head). Seriously, we are planning a hardware upgrade before the parts become unavailable. I do not have any information yet on time lines or upgrade paths, but you good folks on this list will be the first to know. >>> dogriver@xxxxxxxx Wednesday, August 17, 2005 11:49:00 PM >>> I may get beheaded again, but I'd like to know just how old the guts of the BP are, and how likely it is that the components that make up said guts are still going to be available cheaply in the future. Bruce -- Bruce Toews E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: dogriver@xxxxxxxx Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Richard Ehrler wrote: > I'm fairly certain that Larry Skutchan mentioned on one of his podcasts > that there may be a redesign of the BookPort at some future time that > would give the unit more horsepower. Don't know if that would mean > dropping the old model or just adding a second model to meet the needs of > some users. Maybe Larry could jump in here and give us some idea of > direction, knowing that he probably couldn't give specifics. In this > case, a discussion of wish lists could be of use to let APH know things > some of us would like to see. While I don't agree with every idea others > have come up with, we can all get some input into the process if they do > update the unit. > Richard Ehrler > On 2005-08-17 rick.alfaro@xxxxxxxxxxx said: > I think the problem with this discussion is that those that are > wanting additional functionality are fully aware of the fact that > basically, it is a new BookPort that is being envisioned, and not > the current device. Folks that like the device the way it is are > going to be fine, because it would be a totally new model. With > regard to technology, the old saying "if it ain't broke, don't fix > it!" can't apply. If it did, we would still be back in the dark > ages. > I also agree that the current BookPort is absolutely wonderful. > However, I can easily envision a new model with more horse power, > and the ability to do just about everything I have seen mentioned > here. > I also think that one shouldn't assume that you have to sacrifice > size and weight to gain functionality. With today's technology, I > don't believe one has to make that sacrifice. Just my 2 cents > worth of course. > --Best regards, > --Rick Alfaro > > >