[bookport] Re: Realistic Wish List

  • From: "Marlaina Lieberg" <marlaina@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 20:24:54 -0700

Well, I'm still hoping they'll come up with one to make my coffee, uncork my wine and find for me the best chocolate on the planet. Till then, I'm completely satisfied, oh except I wanna read ogg files, SMILE!

Marlaina, writing from Twin Falls Idaho.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Ehrler" <Richard.Ehrler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 8:21 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Realistic Wish List



I'm fairly certain that Larry Skutchan mentioned on one of his podcasts
that there may be a redesign of the BookPort at some future time that
would give the unit more horsepower.  Don't know if that would mean
dropping the old model or just adding a second model to meet the needs of
some users.  Maybe Larry could jump in here and give us some idea of
direction, knowing that he probably couldn't give specifics.  In this
case, a discussion of wish lists could be of use to let APH know things
some of us would like to see.  While I don't agree with every idea others
have come up with, we can all get some input into the process if they do
update the unit.
Richard Ehrler
On 2005-08-17 rick.alfaro@xxxxxxxxxxx said:
   I think the problem with this discussion is that those that are
   wanting additional functionality are fully aware of the fact that
   basically, it is a new BookPort that is being envisioned, and not
   the current device.  Folks that like the device the way it is are
   going to be fine, because it would be a totally new model.  With
   regard to technology, the old saying "if it ain't broke, don't fix
   it!" can't apply.  If it did, we would still be back in the dark
   ages.
   I also agree that the current BookPort is absolutely wonderful.
   However, I can easily envision a new model with more horse power,
   and the ability to do just about everything I have seen mentioned
   here.
   I also think that one shouldn't assume that you have to sacrifice
   size and weight to gain functionality.  With today's technology, I
   don't believe one has to make that sacrifice.  Just my 2 cents
   worth of course.
   --Best regards,
   --Rick Alfaro





Other related posts: