Why not use a lithum cell to keep config info but use regular batteries as well as make the batt pack an option? -----Original Message----- From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert Acosta Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 10:00 AM To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bookport] Re: Ordinary Batteries? Pamela, i am glad that you guys are switching to the battery packs as the contacts do bend easily. Will I be able to use the batter pack in my Bookport or is this for the new versions? Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: "PAMELA RADER" <PRADER@xxxxxxx> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 5:46 AM Subject: [bookport] Re: Ordinary Batteries? > Since I wasn't involved in the decision-making process, but because I > test Book Ports that come in for repair, I can only assume that it > seemed more logical in the end to use a battery pack. The current > design has been very problematic, because the contacts bend easily, so > they were looking for an easier option. Also, quite sometime ago, you > may remember Larry did a survey on which type of springs were preferred. > Plus, the decision to include an AC Adaptor weighed in on the decision. > Personally, I'd rather see it remain as portable as it is, but that's > just my opinion. But on the other hand, we use battery packs in our > tape recorders and cell phones and it's not all that bad. > > > > > > Pamela Rader, TECHNICAL SUPPORT > American Printing House For The Blind > 1839 Frankfort Ave. > Louisville, KY 40206 > > PHONE: 1-800-223-1839, Ext. 307 > > >>>> ka7ojt@xxxxxxxxxxx 01/16/07 10:37PM >>> > I am replying not only to express agreement but to make an honest > inquiry as to what, if any, are the advantages of using a > proprietary battery pack rather than those which are readily > available such as double A batteries. > > > Don Roberts > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Franklin Johnson" <franklin1234@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 6:01 PM > Subject: [bookport] Re: Ordinary Batteries? > > > Pamela I wish APH would reconsider making the rechargeable > battery > pack proprietary. The rechargeable feature is a good idea. > However > many of the users of the BookPort are on limited incomes and > typically one is unable to get bye sending a device in for > servicing > for less than @100 when all is said and done. > > At 03:16 PM 1/16/2007, you wrote: >>Richard: >> >>I don't know all of the particulars, but I know it's going to be >>a >>rechargeable Battery Pack, which will be replaceable, but you'll >>probably order it from APH. >> >> >> >>Pamela Rader, TECHNICAL SUPPORT >>American Printing House For The Blind >>1839 Frankfort Ave. >>Louisville, KY 40206 >> >>PHONE: 1-800-223-1839, Ext. 307 >> >> >> >>> ring.richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 01/16/07 03:13PM >>> >>Pam: >>Although I can tell that the Bookport 2 will most likely have >>rechargeable batteries, will they be user replaceable? >>Or, could they be removed and ordinary non-rechargeable >>batteries be >>substituted; or, is it way too soon to know? >>I only ask this question because I have been in situations where >>I >>really wanted to finish a book and the batteries died and I >>wasn't >>near >>any kind of outlet. > > > > > __________ NOD32 1983 (20070117) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.eset.com > > > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.13/632 - Release Date: 1/16/2007 > 4:36 PM > >