[blindwoodworker] Re: Studs again
- From: "John Sherrer" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <blindwoodworker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:37:15 -0500
You may be correct, I really do not know.
John
From: blindwoodworker-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blindwoodworker-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bob Kennedy
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 9:55 PM
To: blindwoodworker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blindwoodworker] Re: Studs again
It may work, but a pocket hole takes a good bit of wood out of the way
during drilling. Also it's common to use 16 gauge nails and I'm not aware
of any pocket hole screw to have that diameter. My concern is with sheer
strength. There has to be a certain amount of give built in to a building
and I don't know the ideal amount, but I think a typical diameter pocket
hole screw shaft would be testing the limits.
Keep in mind I don't have a problem with a larger sized diameter screw for
the same job. A 3.5 inch long #10 or #12 would be fine.
----- Original Message -----
From: John Sherrer <mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: blindwoodworker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 9:11 PM
Subject: [blindwoodworker] Studs again
During our last discussion about Studs, Bob said that screws are not strong
enough. I have thought about that a lot.
It would be easy to use pocket holes for studs.
If I am wrong, please correct me.
The purpose of toe nails is to hold the stud in place, the load bearing has
nothing to do with the toe nails. So if the screws only job was to hold the
studs in place, then whyWhy are screws too weak to hold the studs?
Their is stress with wind and storms, but if a building is sheeted
correctly, that would make the studs very strong.
John
BlindWoodWorker.com
Join our discussion list at:
blindwoodworker-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with Subscribe in the subject.
Other related posts:
