Hi Mike, In that case, why did Applian go ahead and rebuild its web site recently? I would agree with you were it not for the rebuild, which was done without the promised alt tags. Applian already decided to focus on the web site; I'm just asking that they go ahead and follow through with prior promises to several of us. Please visit http://BlindWebAccess.com and sign the petition asking Yahoo! to make their CAPTCHA accessible! Darrell Shandrow - Accessibility Evangelist Information should be accessible to us without need of translation by another person. Blind Access Journal blog and podcast: http://www.blindaccessjournal.com Check out high quality telecommunications services at http://ld.net/?nu7i ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Pietruk" <pietruk@xxxxxxxxx> To: <blindreplay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 1:26 PM Subject: [blindreplay] Re: Coming Soon Improvements to Daryl The major weakness of the Replay AV website isn't its blindness usability; it is its lack of content as compared with www.radiotime.com. From what I read on the Replay AV website, it sounds as if Applian is woefully undermanned when it comes to handling the site. Hence, time taken to improve blind friendliness is time taken away from updating the site. And there is a lot of work needed to improve amount of content, which benefits a whole lot more folks (and drives sales) than is gained by focusing too much on usability. Sure, we want both; but I don't see usability as a major problem with the website. There are no free lunches; and to gain something, you have to pay a price -- and, in this instance, the price is doing more work yourself to decode urls that the website cannot automatically not subscribe for you. -- To unsubscribe: e-mail blindreplay-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe in subject To contact list owner: e-mail blindreplay-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe: e-mail blindreplay-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe in subject To contact list owner: e-mail blindreplay-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx