[bct] which FTP client and why?

  • From: "Ray Foret Jr." <rforetjr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <blindcooltech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:28:30 -0600


The subject line asks it all.  Right now, I'm doing my podcast via the :
site and, while I can get along pretty well with it as I do not need an FPT 
client but can upload my files through upload links on the site itself, I 
may wish to switch to feedburner.com in future.  First, I am assuming that 
this will require me to find hoasting somewhere.  Second, I assume I'll need 
an FPT client.  Is there really that much difference between Cute FTP and 
FTP Explorer?  For those of you who prefer FTP Explorer, why do you prefer 
it over Cute FTP?  And, for those of you who prefer Cute FTP, why?  Thanks.

PS.  Not looking to open a can of wworms here; but, I just can't see much 
difference between them from what I've red.  They cost about the same and to 
me, they both seem to offer the same flexibility.  I'm looking forward to 
hearing from y'all about this.  Thanks.

Sincerely yours,
The Constantly Barefoot,
Home phone and fax:
Skype Name:
God bless President George W. Bush!
God bless our troops!
and God bless America 

Other related posts: