[bct] Re: Teamtalk

  • From: "Sarah" <kales2@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <blindcooltech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 13:00:44 -0700

Yes. I posted a reply about that a few minutes ago. Hopefully my ISP didn't eat 
the email for lunch. It is talking about patch chords and how I have my set up 
set up.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Tim Cumings 
  To: blindcooltech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 2:10 AM
  Subject: [bct] Re: Teamtalk

  Is there an easy way of recording  team talk conversations?
  ---- Original Message ----- 
    From: Sarah 
    To: blindcooltech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 9:25 PM
    Subject: [bct] Re: Teamtalk

    You can actually make a private room that is password protected and who 
    has the password can get in. I've done that many a time. It really works.
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: "Monica Willyard" <plumlipstick@xxxxxxxxxx>
    To: <blindcooltech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 6:01 PM
    Subject: [bct] Re: Teamtalk

    >Hi.  I have heard a lot about Teamtalk lately.  While I like the
    >idea of good sound quality, it seems to have a built-in
    >drawback.  If I'm wrong, please feel free to correct me here.  It
    >seems that because Teamtalk requires use of someone's server, it
    >lacks the ability to have a private or semi-private conversation
    >between 2 or 3 people.  It seems that if I logged into a Teamtalk
    >server and started talking to someone nice, that conversation would
    >be open to anyone else who happens to connect.  If someone else
    >connected to the server who happened to be abusive or just
    >disruptive to the existing conversation, there seems to be no way to
    >talk privately or remove the new person from the conversation.  With
    >Skype, I can control who I'm talking to for the most part and can
    >elect to talk one on one with my friends.  Am I understanding this 

    Visit my blog at: http://plumlipstick.livejournal.com

Other related posts: