[bct] Re: Teamtalk

  • From: "Sarah" <kales2@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <blindcooltech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 18:58:52 -0700

Yep that password protected channel has come in handy at times. *smiles* 
Take care all.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Farhan Khan" <Farhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Monica Willyard" <blindcooltech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 6:35 PM
Subject: [bct] Re: Teamtalk

Hi, actually teamtalk, at least the server I visit most, has the user 
creates channel option, this means, that you and all your peoples could 
create a channel with a password, and it would be like that till you left, 
then it would go away.
When you needed it again, all you'd have to do is recreate it, or if you 
talked to people, you could probably get a static channel.
ON 5/16/2006 at 20:34 Monica Willyard said

>Hi.  I have heard a lot about Teamtalk lately.  While I like the
>idea of good sound quality, it seems to have a built-in
>drawback.  If I'm wrong, please feel free to correct me here.  It
>seems that because Teamtalk requires use of someone's server, it
>lacks the ability to have a private or semi-private conversation
>between 2 or 3 people.  It seems that if I logged into a Teamtalk
>server and started talking to someone nice, that conversation would
>be open to anyone else who happens to connect.  If someone else
>connected to the server who happened to be abusive or just
>disruptive to the existing conversation, there seems to be no way to
>talk privately or remove the new person from the conversation.  With
>Skype, I can control who I'm talking to for the most part and can
>elect to talk one on one with my friends.  Am I understanding this 

Visit my blog at: http://plumlipstick.livejournal.com

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.6.0/341 - Release Date: 5/16/2006

Other related posts: