[bct] Re: Microtrack podcast

  • From: "Neal Ewers" <neal.ewers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <blindcooltech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 12:09:03 -0600

Someone correct me if I am wrong here.  My Olympus dm20 records in WMA,
but I thought the models people used recorded MP3 files.  Can they also
record in WMA?
 
Thanks.
 
Neal
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: blindcooltech-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blindcooltech-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sam Bushman
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 11:47 AM
To: blindcooltech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bct] Re: Microtrack podcast


does the Olympus record in mp3 or wma?

Thanks
Sam
 
----- Original Message ----- Thanks
 
From: Neal Ewers <mailto:neal.ewers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
To: blindcooltech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 10:44 AM
Subject: [bct] Re: Microtrack podcast

Sam, the biggest differences are:


1.  The MicroTrack can record wav files while the Olympus records MP3
files.

2.  The MicroTrack has manual volume controls while the Olympus is bound
by its limiter.

3. The MicroTrack can take balanced inputs.
 
4.  The MicroTrack can also record directly from a digital source as it
can be configured to have a digital input.
 
5.  The MicroTrack is not nearly as accessible, but it can definitely be
used.  Just ask Larry, or does Jake operate the recorder on those walks
home?
 
Neal

 
-----Original Message-----
From: blindcooltech-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blindcooltech-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sam Bushman
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 11:32 AM
To: BlindCoolTech Email List
Subject: [bct] Microtrack podcast



Hi Neal,
 
Your review / podcast on the microtrack was great.
I have a few questions though.
 
The hiss was much grater on the microtrack  than it was on the mini disk
machine.
That was a valuable comparison for us.
But, what would the difference be between the Olympus and the
microtrack?
Have you been able to test this?
 
Thanks so much
Great work
Sam
 

Other related posts: