[bct] Re: Making things cross disability accessible
- From: "Darrell Shandrow" <nu7i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <blindcooltech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 17:43:53 -0700
The solution is easy. The sighted person with the allergy can just take the
next flight. There are lots of risks one takes when flying in a cramped
self-contained tube at 30 plus thousand feet: allergies, crying babies,
exposure to airborne communicative illnesses, noisy people, potential for
terrorism, turbulence, and on and on. Irregardless, there is never any
excuse for abridging a blind person's ability to travel or do anything else
we want to do, anytime, anyplace. It is always possible for the sighted to
find ways to justify tossing us aside, just like the way I am losing my job!
Darrell Shandrow - Shandrow Communications!
Technology consultant/instructor, network/systems administrator!
A+, CSSA, Network+!
Visit http://www.petitiononline.com/captcha and sign the Google Word
Verification Accessibility Petition today!
Information should be accessible to us without need of translation by
Blind Access Journal blog and podcast: http://www.blindaccessjournal.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "The Scarlet Wombat" <coconut@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 5:30 PM
Subject: [bct] Re: Making things cross disability accessible
The issue of guide dogs in airplanes has several ramifications. What if a
passenger is very allergic to dog fur?
Other related posts: