[bct] Re: Digital Recorder Dilemma

  • From: "LARRY SKUTCHAN" <lskutchan@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <blindcooltech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 11:52:18 -0400

This is something we are looking at.

>>> nu7i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Thursday, October 20, 2005 10:20:25 AM >>>
Hi Larry,

The Book Port already has very basic recording capability.  Is there
chance of adding a jack for an external stereo mic and some ability to

record in MP3 and/or Wave at a minimum of 128 Kbps, 44.1 KHz?  Yeah, I
I'm asking too much, right?

Darrell Shandrow - Shandrow Communications!
Technology consultant/instructor, network/systems administrator!
A+, CSSA, Network+!
Check out high quality telecommunications services at
Information should be accessible to us without need of translation by 
another person.
Blind Access Journal blog: http://www.blindaccessjournal.com 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "LARRY SKUTCHAN" <lskutchan@xxxxxxx>
To: <blindcooltech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 6:33 AM
Subject: [bct] Re: Digital Recorder Dilemma

>I would say the ws series would be just about perfect if they hadn't
> dropped the highest quality setting down to 64 kbps.  I love the
> of the usb port.  Surely there has to be something out there...
>>>> maryemerson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Thursday, October 20, 2005 8:16:31 AM
> Hi all,
> I poked around on the Sound Professionals web site and Amazon and
> couldn't find anything promising. The high-end ones on the SP site
> over $2,000; there was one for about $400 but it uses minidiscs
> defeats the whole purpose of portability. I looked at some Sony
> recorders and they use memory sticks and I suspect the quality
> measure up.
> I noticed the lack of low-end sould on the podcasts recorded with
> WS200S, and compared that to the latest one where there's much more
> frequency range; on the WS200S the cars sound like they are on a wet
> street, but the Olympus and iRiver make them sound more realistic.
> sure if that's what other people noticed or not. I may go for the
> anyway since I would really like the higher capacity and it doesn't
> much difference with the kind of stuff I record.
> After briefly looking around, things don't look too promising. I
> noticed that some companies are combining digital voice with small
> cameras.
> Mary

Other related posts: