RE: using the plextalk

  • From: "Kevin Jones" <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <blindcasting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:09:59 -0500

It is expensive, but I already own one, so might as well use it.

-----Original Message-----
From: blindcasting-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blindcasting-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Claude Everett
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 7:48 AM
To: blindcasting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: using the plextalk

  I've heard, It has it's drawbacks too!  and... it's expensive.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kevin Jones" <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <blindcasting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 5:33 AM
Subject: using the plextalk

> There's been lots of disgussion about the iriver and other small 
> flash-based
> digital recorders, and they're all cool, but I was wondering what the
> thoughts out there were on how good of a recorder is the plextalk. It was
> designed for daisy books but it can record in both mp3 and wav, you can 
> use
> stereo mics with a mic pre-amp, so it has potential.
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.14/128 - Release Date: 
> 10/10/2005

Other related posts: