Re: WINDOWS OR MAC? APPLE SAYS BOTH

  • From: "Lino Morales" <lmorales@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <blindcasting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 01:00:22 -0400

Hey thanks Chris,
I know I'm late in responding to this, but I've been getting threw this 
knuckle head what you said in this message. To each his own!
Lino Morales and Louie Lab
email and Messenger
lmorales@xxxxxxxxxxx
Skype lino_and_louie
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chris Skarstad" <toonhead@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <blindcasting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2006 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: WINDOWS OR MAC? APPLE SAYS BOTH


If you don't mind me saying, this thread is becoming tiresome. It is
serving very little purpose, other than for people to go back and
forth about wether or not Windows or Mac is the best.
I'm going to play the diplomat here and say that it's all about what
you like to use. If you find that you like to use the Mac OS, and it
does what you want to use, then by God, use it! and if, like me,
Windows works for you, then use that.  I am sick and tired of these
arguments and I wish they'd stop.
Just use what you want to use and if someone else chooses to use
something else, don't make fun of them or condemn them.   They made a
choice, so let them be who they're going to be.




At 03:10 PM 4/8/2006, you wrote:
>itunes? important?
>You got to be kidding me. and how different do you see apples
>accessibility framework from microsoft's msaa or jaws and window eyes
>needing standard windows controls?
>BlindTech of BlindTechs.Net
>blindtech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>website: http://blindtechs.net
>Visit our website where we offer free email, shell accounts,
>shoutcast radio service, online games and more!
>Powered by Unix not Microsoft
>
>
>On Apr 8, 2006, at 9:10 AM, Darrell Shandrow wrote:
>
>>Hi Gabe,
>>
>>When I questioned an Apple rep at one of the CSUN presentations,
>>even she didn't know what to say when I brought up the weak
>>application support in VoiceOver, other than it is the app's
>>responsibility to support VoiceOver. We all know how well that's
>>going to work.  She couldn't tell me much about Apple's total lack
>>of support in VoiceOver for such important built-in apps as iTunes,
>>either.  Very disappointing.
>>
>>
>>Darrell Shandrow - Shandrow Communications!
>>Technology consultant/instructor, network/systems administrator!
>>A+, CSSA, Network+!
>>Visit http://www.petitiononline.com/captcha and sign the Google
>>Word Verification Accessibility Petition today!
>>Information should be accessible to us without need of translation
>>by another person.
>>Blind Access Journal blog and podcast: http:// www.blindaccessjournal.com
>>----- Original Message ----- From: "BlindTech of BlindTechs.Net"
>><blindtech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>To: <blindcasting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2006 1:58 AM
>>Subject: Re: WINDOWS OR MAC? APPLE SAYS BOTH
>>
>>
>>>can you tell me, what limitations, you "KNOW" of and not
>>>limitations  that you "HEARD" of.
>>>BlindTech of BlindTechs.Net
>>>blindtech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>website: http://blindtechs.net
>>>Visit our website where we offer free email, shell accounts,
>>>shoutcast radio service, online games and more!
>>>Powered by Unix not Microsoft
>>>
>>>
>>>On Apr 7, 2006, at 3:10 PM, Chris Skarstad wrote:
>>>
>>>>Well, now all that's different is the hardware.  But my question
>>>>is, what makes mac hardware so much better than Windows stuff?
>>>>I do have to admit that i like the idea of just being able to
>>>>walk  up to any computer, hit a hotkey and have a screenreader.
>>>>I've  never been a mac geek, but I do have to say I'm impressed
>>>>with the  idea. Now all they need to do is make it a *true*
>>>>screenreader, one  that is as powerful as JAWS and Window-eyes.
>>>>Right now, it is good  but there are still limitations.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>At 02:20 AM 4/7/2006, you wrote:
>>>>>600 is quite a bit?
>>>>>BlindTech of BlindTechs.Net
>>>>>blindtech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>website: http://blindtechs.net
>>>>>Visit our website where we offer free email, shell accounts,
>>>>>shoutcast radio service, online games and more!
>>>>>Powered by Unix not Microsoft
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>On Apr 6, 2006, at 1:36 PM, Steve Holmes wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>>Hash: RIPEMD160
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Actually I would be much happier if it were to go the other way
>>>>>>-  run
>>>>>>Mac OS X on generic Intel machines.  I would love to run the
>>>>>>Mac  OS on
>>>>>>my currently owned windows box.  In fact, if Voice over gets
>>>>>>just a
>>>>>>little bit better, i would love to scrap winblows entirely and
>>>>>>just
>>>>>>run
>>>>>>the Mac and Linux partitions instead.  But to buy a new Mac from
>>>>>>start,
>>>>>>that would set me back quite a bit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 03:21:45PM -0400, Jerry Halatyn wrote:
>>>>>>>Windows will run natively on Intel-based Macs so,k yes, you can
>>>>>>>install
>>>>>>>JAWS or any other Windows screen reader or screen access
>>>>>>>software.
>>>>>>>Very
>>>>>>>exciting development.
>>>>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>From: "Allison Mervis" <allisonfm@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>To: <blindcasting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 1:27 PM
>>>>>>>Subject: Re: WINDOWS OR MAC? APPLE SAYS BOTH
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I assume that we could potentially load jaws on to the Mac and
>>>>>>>>use it with
>>>>>>>>XP, and then play with voiceover every now and then.
>>>>>>>>Allison
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>- --
>>>>>>HolmesGrown Solutions
>>>>>>The best solutions for the best price!
>>>>>>http://ld.net/?holmesgrown
>>>>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>>Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>iD8DBQFENXvgWSjv55S0LfERA7p6AJwP2FtmfkItKdfvKYlYd7YQoqRHwACfaBPH
>>>>>>zLstf2XZEDdfWgU4HtSHy+0=
>>>>>>=qSuH
>>>>>>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>





Other related posts: