Re: Subject lines

  • From: "Gary Wood" <k8hlx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <blindcasting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 02:43:48 -0500

I agree, Debbie!
----- Original Message ----- From: "Debbie Hazelton" <healinghands4u@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <blindcasting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 9:51 PM
Subject: RE: Subject lines

Excuse me, but how many moderators do we have here?  I believe only one.'

-----Original Message-----
From: blindcasting-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blindcasting-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Holmes
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 12:39 PM
To: blindcasting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Subject lines

Hash: RIPEMD160

Yes and while we're at cleaning up the list a bit, please confine private
replies to the original sender instead of the whole list, please. If your
mailer doesn't support replying privately to messages from mailing lists,
then time to find another mailer that does. They really do exist. Frankly,
The outlook mailers are among the sorst about this kind of thing.

On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 06:05:47PM +1100, Scott Rutkowski wrote:
HI all.

Could everyone please make sure they have the appropriate subject line
for there messages to the list?
This last subject Message to deb the message content isn't even
remotely related to the original thread.

I'm simply asking everyone to use the appropriate subject line for
there email because those who don't want to read certain messages skip
over them and if the subject line isn't correct there may be some
useful content in that particular message but no one will know because of
the subject line.

No flames please. I'm not the moderator but am simply trying to help the list.

- -- HolmesGrown Solutions The best solutions for the best price! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)


Other related posts: