Well, the whole thing is fascinating to me. What I don't think the recording industry has really come to terms with is the fact that the general cost of distribution of recorded music has come down tremendously, not to mention the fact of the various ways of distrtibuting it, and the industry seems to keep their means of distribution, namely the cd, artificially high. I can understand in a way them going after someone who plays only commercial, wellknown music which can be heard on any top 40 station or whatever, but another thing they forget is that with a wider distribution of all sorts of music, it opens people's minds up to music they may not normally listen to, and thus provides an advertising medium for the industry. However, I'm rather afraid that the digital medium may be it's own downfall in that it's very easy to disallow people from listening to your station without paying a subscription, which is the way I rather think things might go. However, keeping it on topic, I think they're being extremely petti-minded if they go after people for mashups or contests where bits of tracks are played. Mind you I heard an interesting one this morning from a friend of mine, who was putting on a play and wanted to use a Nowel Coward song. What in fact she was told was that she could not use the song, but could use the words if she composed a different tune - now how stupid can you get? Chrissie > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/165 - Release Date: 09/11/2005 > >